IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0126444.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diagnostic Value of Osteopontin in Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Zhi-De Hu
  • Ting-Ting Wei
  • Min Yang
  • Ning Ma
  • Qing-Qin Tang
  • Bao-Dong Qin
  • Hai-Tao Fu
  • Ren-Qian Zhong

Abstract

Aims: Osteopontin (OPN) plays an important role in many physiological and pathological processes (wound healing, inflammation, immune response, and tumorigenesis). This meta-analysis assessed the diagnostic value of osteopontin in ovarian cancer. Methods and Results: Searches in Embase and PubMed were conducted, in order to identify eligible studies on osteopontin expression and its diagnostic value in ovarian cancer. The revised Quality Assessment for Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (QUADAS-2) tool was applied to examine the quality of these studies and the overall osteopontin diagnostic accuracy in ovarian cancer was pooled using the bivariate model. The publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Deek’s test. This search methodology resulted in 13 studies with a total of 839 ovarian cancer patients and 1439 controls in this meta-analysis. The overall osteopontin diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of ovarian cancer were 0.66 (95% CI, 0.51–0.78) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.78–0.93), respectively. The area under summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves (AUC) was 0.85 (95%CI, 0.81–0.88). There was no significant publication bias observed across the eligible studies. However, a major design deficiency of the eligible studies is the issue of subject selection bias. Conclusions: Osteopontin could be a useful biomarker in diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Due to the design deficits of the eligible studies, a future study with a larger sample size and better design is needed to rigorously confirm the diagnostic potential of osteopontin in ovarian cancer.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhi-De Hu & Ting-Ting Wei & Min Yang & Ning Ma & Qing-Qin Tang & Bao-Dong Qin & Hai-Tao Fu & Ren-Qian Zhong, 2015. "Diagnostic Value of Osteopontin in Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0126444
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0126444
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0126444&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0126444?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0126444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.