IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0125244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Prognostic Score for Patients with Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transarterial Chemoembolization

Author

Listed:
  • Sadahisa Ogasawara
  • Tetsuhiro Chiba
  • Yoshihiko Ooka
  • Naoya Kanogawa
  • Tenyu Motoyama
  • Eiichiro Suzuki
  • Akinobu Tawada
  • Ryosaku Azemoto
  • Masami Shinozaki
  • Masaharu Yoshikawa
  • Osamu Yokosuka

Abstract

Background: Intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), defined according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system, is a heterogeneous condition with variable clinical benefits from transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). This study aimed to develop a simple validated prognostic score based on the predictive factors for survival in patients with intermediate-stage HCC treated with TACE. Methods: Three-hundred and fifty patients with intermediate-stage HCC undergoing initial TACE at Chiba University Hospital (training cohort; n = 187) and two affiliated hospitals (validation cohort; n = 163) were included. Following variables were entered into univariate and multivariate Cox regression models to develop a points-based clinical scoring system: gender, age, etiology, pretreatment, Child–Pugh score, aspartate aminotransferase, creatinine, C-reactive protein, alfa-fetoprotein, size of the largest lesion, and number and location of lesions. Results: The number of lesions and the Child–Pugh score were identified as independent prognostic factors in the training cohort. The development of a 0–7-point prognostic score, named the Chiba HCC in intermediate-stage prognostic (CHIP) score, was based on the sum of three subscale scores (Child–Pugh score = 0, 1, 2, or 3, respectively, number of lesions = 0, 2, or 3, respectively, HCV-RNA positivity = 0 or 1, respectively). The generated scores were then differentiated into five groups (0–2 points, 3 points, 4 points, 5 points, and 6–7 points) by the median survival time (65.2, 29.2, 24.3, 13.1, and 8.4 months, respectively; p

Suggested Citation

  • Sadahisa Ogasawara & Tetsuhiro Chiba & Yoshihiko Ooka & Naoya Kanogawa & Tenyu Motoyama & Eiichiro Suzuki & Akinobu Tawada & Ryosaku Azemoto & Masami Shinozaki & Masaharu Yoshikawa & Osamu Yokosuka, 2015. "A Prognostic Score for Patients with Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transarterial Chemoembolization," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0125244
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0125244
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0125244&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0125244?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sadahisa Ogasawara & Tetsuhiro Chiba & Yoshihiko Ooka & Eiichiro Suzuki & Masanori Inoue & Toru Wakamatsu & Akinobu Tawada & Osamu Yokosuka, 2016. "Analysis of Sorafenib Outcome: Focusing on the Clinical Course in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Shuangshuang Li & Xudong Feng & Guodong Cao & Qianhui Wang & Ling Wang, 2020. "Prognostic significance of inflammatory indices in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transarterial chemoembolization: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0125244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.