IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0125002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Longitudinal Changes in Self-Reported Walking Ability in Multiple Sclerosis

Author

Listed:
  • Robert W Motl
  • Norman Putzki
  • Lara A Pilutti
  • Diego Cadavid

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported outcomes are increasingly used to understand the clinical meaningfulness of multiple sclerosis disability and its treatments. For example, the 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12) measures the patient-reported impact of the disease on walking ability. Objective: We studied longitudinal changes in walking ability using the MSWS-12 in a cohort of 108 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and moderate-to-severe disability from a single US center cohort study investigating multiple sclerosis symptoms and physical activity. Methods: The MSWS-12 was completed every 6 months over 2 years together with self-reported measures of disease impact on daily life (Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale) and walking disability (Patient Determined Disease Steps scale). Results: The results revealed a high frequency of self-reported changes in walking ability at the individual level, affecting approximately 80% of patients for all four time periods. MSWS-12 scores remained stable at the group level for all four time periods. The magnitude of observed changes at the individual level was higher than the proposed minimal clinically important differences of 4 or 6 points and correlated better with Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale physical scores than psychological scores, but little with self-reported Patient Determined Disease Steps Scale scores. Conclusions: This novel finding of frequent fluctuations in self-reported walking ability is new and requires further investigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert W Motl & Norman Putzki & Lara A Pilutti & Diego Cadavid, 2015. "Longitudinal Changes in Self-Reported Walking Ability in Multiple Sclerosis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-12, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0125002
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0125002
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0125002&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0125002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rotem Orbach & Zhenming Zhao & Yong-Cheng Wang & Gilmore O’Neill & Diego Cadavid, 2012. "Comparison of Disease Activity in SPMS and PPMS in the Context of Multicenter Clinical Trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-10, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gautam Adusumilli & Samantha Lancia & Victoria A Levasseur & Vaishak Amblee & Megan Orchard & Joanne M Wagner & Robert T Naismith, 2018. "Turning is an important marker of balance confidence and walking limitation in persons with multiple sclerosis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-10, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0125002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.