IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0123866.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subcutaneous Bortezomib in Multiple Myeloma Patients Induces Similar Therapeutic Response Rates as Intravenous Application But It Does Not Reduce the Incidence of Peripheral Neuropathy

Author

Listed:
  • Jiri Minarik
  • Petr Pavlicek
  • Ludek Pour
  • Tomas Pika
  • Vladimir Maisnar
  • Ivan Spicka
  • Jiri Jarkovsky
  • Marta Krejci
  • Jaroslav Bacovsky
  • Jakub Radocha
  • Jan Straub
  • Petr Kessler
  • Marek Wrobel
  • Lenka Walterova
  • Michal Sykora
  • Jarmila Obernauerova
  • Lucie Brozova
  • Evzen Gregora
  • Dagmar Adamova
  • Jaromir Gumulec
  • Zdenek Adam
  • Vlastimil Scudla
  • Roman Hajek
  • for the Czech Myeloma Group

Abstract

Objective: Subcutaneous (SC) application of bortezomib has been recently introduced as a new application route in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. We performed an analysis to compare the outcomes of bortezomib-based therapy in multiple myeloma (MM) patients treated using either intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous (SC) route of administration. Patients and methods: During January 2012 through December 2013, we performed a retrospective analysis of 446 patients with MM treated with bortezomib-based regimens (either once weekly – 63% or twice weekly – 27%) in both, the first line setting, and in relapse, with separate analysis of patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. We assessed the response rates and toxicity profiles in both, IV and SC route of bortezomib administration. Results: The response rates in both IV and SC arm were similar with overall response rate 71.7% vs 70.7%, complete remissions in 13.9% vs 8.6%, very good partial remissions in 30.8% vs 34.5% and partial remissions in 27% vs 27.6%. The most frequent grade ≥3 toxicities were anemia, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia, with no significant differences between IV and SC group. There were no significant differences in the rate of peripheral neuropathy (PN). PN of any grade was present in 48% in the IV arm and in 41% in the SC arm. PN grade ≥2 was present in 20% vs 18% and PN grade ≥3 was present in 6% vs 4%. Conclusions: We conclude that subcutaneous application of bortezomib has similar therapeutic outcomes and toxicity profile as intravenous route of application. In our cohort there was no difference in the incidence of PN, suggesting that PN is dose dependent and might be reduced by lower intensity schemes rather than by the route of administration.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiri Minarik & Petr Pavlicek & Ludek Pour & Tomas Pika & Vladimir Maisnar & Ivan Spicka & Jiri Jarkovsky & Marta Krejci & Jaroslav Bacovsky & Jakub Radocha & Jan Straub & Petr Kessler & Marek Wrobel &, 2015. "Subcutaneous Bortezomib in Multiple Myeloma Patients Induces Similar Therapeutic Response Rates as Intravenous Application But It Does Not Reduce the Incidence of Peripheral Neuropathy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-10, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0123866
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0123866
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0123866&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0123866?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0123866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.