IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0123174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Calibration of the γ-H2AX DNA Double Strand Break Focus Assay for Internal Radiation Exposure of Blood Lymphocytes

Author

Listed:
  • Uta Eberlein
  • Michel Peper
  • Maria Fernández
  • Michael Lassmann
  • Harry Scherthan

Abstract

DNA double strand break (DSB) formation induced by ionizing radiation exposure is indicated by the DSB biomarkers γ-H2AX and 53BP1. Knowledge about DSB foci formation in-vitro after internal irradiation of whole blood samples with radionuclides in solution will help us to gain detailed insights about dose-response relationships in patients after molecular radiotherapy (MRT). Therefore, we studied the induction of radiation-induced co-localizing γ-H2AX and 53BP1 foci as surrogate markers for DSBs in-vitro, and correlated the obtained foci per cell values with the in-vitro absorbed doses to the blood for the two most frequently used radionuclides in MRT (I-131 and Lu-177). This approach led to an in-vitro calibration curve. Overall, 55 blood samples of three healthy volunteers were analyzed. For each experiment several vials containing a mixture of whole blood and radioactive solutions with different concentrations of isotonic NaCl-diluted radionuclides with known activities were prepared. Leukocytes were recovered by density centrifugation after incubation and constant blending for 1 h at 37°C. After ethanol fixation they were subjected to two-color immunofluorescence staining and the average frequencies of the co-localizing γ-H2AX and 53BP1 foci/nucleus were determined using a fluorescence microscope equipped with a red/green double band pass filter. The exact activity was determined in parallel in each blood sample by calibrated germanium detector measurements. The absorbed dose rates to the blood per nuclear disintegrations occurring in 1 ml of blood were calculated for both isotopes by a Monte Carlo simulation. The measured blood doses in our samples ranged from 6 to 95 mGy. A linear relationship was found between the number of DSB-marking foci/nucleus and the absorbed dose to the blood for both radionuclides studied. There were only minor nuclide-specific intra- and inter-subject deviations.

Suggested Citation

  • Uta Eberlein & Michel Peper & Maria Fernández & Michael Lassmann & Harry Scherthan, 2015. "Calibration of the γ-H2AX DNA Double Strand Break Focus Assay for Internal Radiation Exposure of Blood Lymphocytes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0123174
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0123174
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0123174&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0123174?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Horn & Stephen Barnard & Kai Rothkamm, 2011. "Gamma-H2AX-Based Dose Estimation for Whole and Partial Body Radiation Exposure," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-8, September.
    2. Yentram Huyen & Omar Zgheib & Richard A. DiTullio Jr & Vassilis G. Gorgoulis & Panayotis Zacharatos & Tom J. Petty & Emily A. Sheston & Hestia S. Mellert & Elena S. Stavridi & Thanos D. Halazonetis, 2004. "Methylated lysine 79 of histone H3 targets 53BP1 to DNA double-strand breaks," Nature, Nature, vol. 432(7015), pages 406-411, November.
    3. Nadya Dimitrova & Yi-Chun M. Chen & David L. Spector & Titia de Lange, 2008. "53BP1 promotes non-homologous end joining of telomeres by increasing chromatin mobility," Nature, Nature, vol. 456(7221), pages 524-528, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleix Bayona-Feliu & Emilia Herrera-Moyano & Nibal Badra-Fajardo & Iván Galván-Femenía & María Eugenia Soler-Oliva & Andrés Aguilera, 2023. "The chromatin network helps prevent cancer-associated mutagenesis at transcription-replication conflicts," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Jin H. Yang & Hugo B. Brandão & Anders S. Hansen, 2023. "DNA double-strand break end synapsis by DNA loop extrusion," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Jian Ma & Yingke Zhou & Penglin Pan & Haixin Yu & Zixi Wang & Lei Lily Li & Bing Wang & Yuqian Yan & Yunqian Pan & Qi Ye & Tianjie Liu & Xiaoyu Feng & Shan Xu & Ke Wang & Xinyang Wang & Yanlin Jian & , 2023. "TRABID overexpression enables synthetic lethality to PARP inhibitor via prolonging 53BP1 retention at double-strand breaks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0123174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.