IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0122330.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of High-Dose Rebamipide Treatment for Low-Dose Aspirin-Induced Moderate-to-Severe Small Intestinal Damage

Author

Listed:
  • Toshio Watanabe
  • Toshihisa Takeuchi
  • Osamu Handa
  • Yasuhisa Sakata
  • Tetsuya Tanigawa
  • Masatsugu Shiba
  • Yuji Naito
  • Kazuhide Higuchi
  • Kazuma Fujimoto
  • Toshikazu Yoshikawa
  • Tetsuo Arakawa

Abstract

Background: Low-dose aspirin (LDA) frequently causes small bowel injury. While some drugs have been reported to be effective in treating LDA-induced small intestinal damage, most studies did not exclude patients with mild damage thought to be clinically insignificant. Aim: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy of a high dose of rebamipide, a gastroprotective drug, for LDA-induced moderate-to-severe enteropathy. Methods: We enrolled patients who received 100 mg of enteric-coated aspirin daily for more than 3 months and were found to have more than 3 mucosal breaks (i.e., erosions or ulcers) in the small intestine by capsule endoscopy. Eligible patients were assigned to receive either rebamipide 300 mg (triple dose) 3 times daily or placebo for 8 weeks in a 2:1 ratio. Capsule endoscopy was then repeated. The primary endpoint was the change in the number of mucosal breaks from baseline to 8 weeks. Secondary endpoints included the complete healing of mucosal breaks at 8 weeks and the change in Lewis score (an endoscopic score assessing damage severity) from baseline to 8 weeks. Results: The study was completed by 38 patients (rebamipide group: n = 25, placebo group: n = 13). After 8 weeks of treatment, rebamipide, but not placebo, significantly decreased the number of mucosal breaks (p = 0.046). While the difference was not significant (p = 0.13), the rate of complete mucosal break healing in the rebamipide group (32%, 8 of 25) tended to be higher than that in the placebo group (7.7%, 1 of 13). Rebamipide treatment significantly improved intestinal damage severity as assessed by the Lewis score (p = 0.02), whereas placebo did not. The triple dose of rebamipide was well tolerated. Conclusions: High-dose rebamipide is effective for the treatment of LDA-induced moderate-to-severe enteropathy. Trial Registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000003463

Suggested Citation

  • Toshio Watanabe & Toshihisa Takeuchi & Osamu Handa & Yasuhisa Sakata & Tetsuya Tanigawa & Masatsugu Shiba & Yuji Naito & Kazuhide Higuchi & Kazuma Fujimoto & Toshikazu Yoshikawa & Tetsuo Arakawa, 2015. "A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of High-Dose Rebamipide Treatment for Low-Dose Aspirin-Induced Moderate-to-Severe Small Intestinal Damage," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0122330
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0122330
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0122330&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0122330?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0122330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.