IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0121628.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Approach to Assessing Patient Safety in Hospitals in Low-Income Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Lindfield
  • Abigail Knight
  • Daniel Bwonya

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to assess non-technical aspects of patient safety practices using non-participant observation in different clinical areas. Design: Qualitative study using non-participant observation and thematic analysis. Setting: Two eye care units in Uganda. Participants: Staff members in each hospital. Main outcome measures: A set of observations of patient safety practices by staff members in clinical areas that were then coded using thematic analysis. Results: Twenty codes were developed that explained patient safety practices in the hospitals based on the observations. These were grouped into four themes: the team, the environment, patient-centred care and the process. The complexity of patient safety in each hospital was described using narrative reports to support the thematic analysis. Overall both hospitals demonstrated good patient safety practices however areas for improvement were staff-patient communication, the presence and use of protocols and a focus on consistent practice. Conclusions: This is the first holistic assessment of patient safety practices in a low-income setting. The methods allowed the complexity of patient safety to be understood and explained with areas of concern highlighted. The next step will be to develop a useful and easy to use tool to measure patient safety practices in low-income settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Lindfield & Abigail Knight & Daniel Bwonya, 2015. "An Approach to Assessing Patient Safety in Hospitals in Low-Income Countries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0121628
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121628
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0121628
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0121628&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0121628?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0121628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.