IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0119629.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Priming with a Simplified Intradermal HIV-1 DNA Vaccine Regimen followed by Boosting with Recombinant HIV-1 MVA Vaccine Is Safe and Immunogenic: A Phase IIa Randomized Clinical Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Patricia J Munseri
  • Arne Kroidl
  • Charlotta Nilsson
  • Agricola Joachim
  • Christof Geldmacher
  • Philipp Mann
  • Candida Moshiro
  • Said Aboud
  • Eligius Lyamuya
  • Leonard Maboko
  • Marco Missanga
  • Bahati Kaluwa
  • Sayoki Mfinanga
  • Lilly Podola
  • Asli Bauer
  • Karina Godoy-Ramirez
  • Mary Marovich
  • Bernard Moss
  • Michael Hoelscher
  • Frances Gotch
  • Wolfgang Stöhr
  • Richard Stout
  • Sheena McCormack
  • Britta Wahren
  • Fred Mhalu
  • Merlin L Robb
  • Gunnel Biberfeld
  • Eric Sandström
  • Muhammad Bakari

Abstract

Background: Intradermal priming with HIV-1 DNA plasmids followed by HIV-1MVA boosting induces strong and broad cellular and humoral immune responses. In our previous HIVIS-03 trial, we used 5 injections with 2 pools of HIV-DNA at separate sites for each priming immunization. The present study explores whether HIV-DNA priming can be simplified by reducing the number of DNA injections and administration of combined versus separated plasmid pools. Methods: In this phase IIa, randomized trial, priming was performed using 5 injections of HIV-DNA, 1000 μg total dose, (3 Env and 2 Gag encoding plasmids) compared to two “simplified” regimens of 2 injections of HIV-DNA, 600 μg total dose, of Env- and Gag-encoding plasmid pools with each pool either administered separately or combined. HIV-DNA immunizations were given intradermally at weeks 0, 4, and 12. Boosting was performed intramuscularly with 108 pfu HIV-MVA at weeks 30 and 46. Results: 129 healthy Tanzanian participants were enrolled. There were no differences in adverse events between the groups. The proportion of IFN-γ ELISpot responders to Gag and/or Env peptides after the second HIV-MVA boost did not differ significantly between the groups primed with 2 injections of combined HIV-DNA pools, 2 injections with separated pools, and 5 injections with separated pools (90%, 97% and 97%). There were no significant differences in the magnitude of Gag and/or Env IFN-γ ELISpot responses, in CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses measured as IFN-γ/IL-2 production by intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) or in response rates and median titers for binding antibodies to Env gp160 between study groups. Conclusions: A simplified intradermal vaccination regimen with 2 injections of a total of 600 μg with combined HIV-DNA plasmids primed cellular responses as efficiently as the standard regimen of 5 injections of a total of 1000 μg with separated plasmid pools after boosting twice with HIV-MVA. Trial Registration: World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform PACTR2010050002122368

Suggested Citation

  • Patricia J Munseri & Arne Kroidl & Charlotta Nilsson & Agricola Joachim & Christof Geldmacher & Philipp Mann & Candida Moshiro & Said Aboud & Eligius Lyamuya & Leonard Maboko & Marco Missanga & Bahati, 2015. "Priming with a Simplified Intradermal HIV-1 DNA Vaccine Regimen followed by Boosting with Recombinant HIV-1 MVA Vaccine Is Safe and Immunogenic: A Phase IIa Randomized Clinical Trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0119629
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119629
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0119629
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0119629&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0119629?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0119629. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.