IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0117314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hypertonic Saline for Brain Relaxation and Intracranial Pressure in Patients Undergoing Neurosurgical Procedures: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Author

Listed:
  • Liujiazi Shao
  • Fangxiao Hong
  • Yi Zou
  • Xiaofang Hao
  • Haijun Hou
  • Ming Tian

Abstract

Background: A wealth of evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has indicated that hypertonic saline (HS) is at least as effective as, if not better than, mannitol in the treatment of increased intracranial pressure(ICP). However, there is little known about the effects of HS in patients during neurosurgery. Thus, this meta-analysis was performed to compare the intraoperative effects of HS with mannitol in patients undergoing craniotomy. Methods: According to the research strategy, we searched PUBMED, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Other sources such as the internet-based clinical trial registries and conference proceedings were also searched. After literature searching, two investigators independently performed literature screening, quality assessment of the included trials and data extraction. The outcomes included intraoperative brain relaxation, intraoperative ICP, total volume of fluid required, diuresis, hemodynamic parameters, electrolyte level, mortality or dependence and adverse events. Results: Seven RCTs with 468 participants were included. The quality of the included trials was acceptable. HS could significantly increase the odds of satisfactory intraoperative brain relaxation (OR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.32–3.81; P = 0.003) and decrease the mean difference (MD) of maximal ICP (MD: −2.51mmHg, 95% CI: −3.39—1.93mmHg; P

Suggested Citation

  • Liujiazi Shao & Fangxiao Hong & Yi Zou & Xiaofang Hao & Haijun Hou & Ming Tian, 2015. "Hypertonic Saline for Brain Relaxation and Intracranial Pressure in Patients Undergoing Neurosurgical Procedures: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0117314
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0117314
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0117314&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0117314?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0117314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.