IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0117168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Treatment Safety and Patient Survival in Elderly versus Nonelderly Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Sorafenib Combined with Transarterial Chemoembolization: A Propensity Score Matching Study

Author

Listed:
  • Hao Hu
  • Zhenhua Duan
  • Xiaoran Long
  • Yancu Hertzanu
  • Xiaoqiang Tong
  • Xiaoquan Xu
  • Haibin Shi
  • Sheng Liu
  • Zhengqiang Yang

Abstract

Aims: This retrospective study was carried out to compare the outcomes between elderly (≥70 years of age) and nonelderly patients (

Suggested Citation

  • Hao Hu & Zhenhua Duan & Xiaoran Long & Yancu Hertzanu & Xiaoqiang Tong & Xiaoquan Xu & Haibin Shi & Sheng Liu & Zhengqiang Yang, 2015. "Comparison of Treatment Safety and Patient Survival in Elderly versus Nonelderly Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Sorafenib Combined with Transarterial Chemoembolization: A Pr," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-11, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0117168
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0117168
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0117168&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0117168?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0117168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.