IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0114925.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Association between Recruitment Methods and Attrition in Internet-Based Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Paolo Bajardi
  • Daniela Paolotti
  • Alessandro Vespignani
  • Ken Eames
  • Sebastian Funk
  • W John Edmunds
  • Clement Turbelin
  • Marion Debin
  • Vittoria Colizza
  • Ronald Smallenburg
  • Carl Koppeschaar
  • Ana O Franco
  • Vitor Faustino
  • AnnaSara Carnahan
  • Moa Rehn
  • Franco Merletti
  • Jeroen Douwes
  • Ridvan Firestone
  • Lorenzo Richiardi

Abstract

Internet-based systems for epidemiological studies have advantages over traditional approaches as they can potentially recruit and monitor a wider range of individuals in a relatively inexpensive fashion. We studied the association between communication strategies used for recruitment (offline, online, face-to-face) and follow-up participation in nine Internet-based cohorts: the Influenzanet network of platforms for influenza surveillance which includes seven cohorts in seven different European countries, the Italian birth cohort Ninfea and the New Zealand birth cohort ELF. Follow-up participation varied from 43% to 89% depending on the cohort. Although there were heterogeneities among studies, participants who became aware of the study through an online communication campaign compared with those through traditional offline media seemed to have a lower follow-up participation in 8 out of 9 cohorts. There were no clear differences in participation between participants enrolled face-to-face and those enrolled through other offline strategies. An Internet-based campaign for Internet-based epidemiological studies seems to be less effective than an offline one in enrolling volunteers who keep participating in follow-up questionnaires. This suggests that even for Internet-based epidemiological studies an offline enrollment campaign would be helpful in order to achieve a higher participation proportion and limit the cohort attrition.

Suggested Citation

  • Paolo Bajardi & Daniela Paolotti & Alessandro Vespignani & Ken Eames & Sebastian Funk & W John Edmunds & Clement Turbelin & Marion Debin & Vittoria Colizza & Ronald Smallenburg & Carl Koppeschaar & An, 2014. "Association between Recruitment Methods and Attrition in Internet-Based Studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0114925
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0114925
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0114925&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0114925?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0114925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.