IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0114350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fears and Beliefs in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Spondyloarthritis: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Francis Berenbaum
  • Pierre Chauvin
  • Christophe Hudry
  • Florence Mathoret-Philibert
  • Maud Poussiere
  • Thibault De Chalus
  • Caroline Dreuillet
  • Françoise Russo-Marie
  • Jean-Michel Joubert
  • Alain Saraux

Abstract

Objectives: To explore beliefs and apprehensions about disease and its treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis. Methods: 25 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and 25 with spondyloarthritis participated in semi-structured interviews about their disease and its treatment. The interviews were performed by trained interviewers in participants' homes. The interviews were recorded and the main themes identified by content analysis. Results: Patients differentiated between the underlying cause of the disease, which was most frequently identified as a hereditary or individual predisposition. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, the most frequently cited triggering factor for disease onset was a psychological factor or life-event, whereas patients with spondyloarthritis tended to focus more on an intrinsic vulnerability to disease. Stress and overexertion were considered important triggering factors for exacerbations, and relaxation techniques were frequently cited strategies to manage exacerbations. The unpredictability of the disease course was a common source of anxiety. Beliefs about the disease and apprehensions about the future tended to evolve over the course of the disease, as did treatment expectations. Conclusions: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis hold a core set of beliefs and apprehensions that reflect their level of information about their disease and are not necessarily appropriate. The physician can initiate discussion of these beliefs in order to dispel misconceptions, align treatment expectations, provide reassurance to the patient and readjust disease management. Such a dialogue would help improve standards of care in these chronic and incapacitating diseases.

Suggested Citation

  • Francis Berenbaum & Pierre Chauvin & Christophe Hudry & Florence Mathoret-Philibert & Maud Poussiere & Thibault De Chalus & Caroline Dreuillet & Françoise Russo-Marie & Jean-Michel Joubert & Alain Sar, 2014. "Fears and Beliefs in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Spondyloarthritis: A Qualitative Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0114350
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0114350
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0114350&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0114350?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0114350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.