IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0107831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors That Drive Dentists towards or Away from Dental Caries Preventive Measures: Systematic Review and Metasummary

Author

Listed:
  • Uhana Seifert Guimarães Suga
  • Raquel Sano Suga Terada
  • Adriana Lemos Mori Ubaldini
  • Mitsue Fujimaki
  • Renata Corrêa Pascotto
  • Adelia Portero Batilana
  • Ricardo Pietrobon
  • João Ricardo N Vissoci
  • Clarissa G Rodrigues

Abstract

Background: Dental caries is a serious public health concern. The high cost of dental treatment can be avoided by effective preventive measures, which are dependent on dentists’ adherence. This study aimed to evaluate the factors that drive dentists towards or away from dental caries preventive measures. Methods and Findings: This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42012002235). Several databases as well as the reference lists and citations of the included publications were searched according to PRISMA guidelines, yielding 18,276 titles and abstracts, which were assessed to determine study eligibility. Seven qualitative studies and 41 surveys (36,501 participants) remained after data extraction and interpretation. A total of 43 findings were abstracted from the reports and were grouped together into 6 categories that were judged to be topically similar: education and training, personal beliefs, work conditions, remuneration, gender, place of residence and patients. The main findings for adherence based on their calculated frequency effect sizes (ES) were teamwork (21%) and post-graduation (12%), while for non-adherence were biologicism (27%), and remuneration for preventive procedures (25%). Intensity ES were also calculated and demonstrated low prevalence of the findings. Quality assessment of the studies demonstrated that the methodological quality, particularly of surveys, varied widely among studies. Conclusions: Despite the questionable quality of the included reports, the evidence that emerged seems to indicate that further education and training coupled with a fairer pay scheme would be a reasonable approach to change the balance in favor of the provision of dental caries preventive measures by dentists. The results of this review could be of value in the planning and decision making processes aimed at encouraging changes in professional dental practice that could result in the improvement of the oral health care provided to the population in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Uhana Seifert Guimarães Suga & Raquel Sano Suga Terada & Adriana Lemos Mori Ubaldini & Mitsue Fujimaki & Renata Corrêa Pascotto & Adelia Portero Batilana & Ricardo Pietrobon & João Ricardo N Vissoci &, 2014. "Factors That Drive Dentists towards or Away from Dental Caries Preventive Measures: Systematic Review and Metasummary," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-1, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0107831
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0107831
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0107831&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0107831?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0107831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.