IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0099866.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combined Influence of Visual Scene and Body Tilt on Arm Pointing Movements: Gravity Matters!

Author

Listed:
  • Cécile Scotto Di Cesare
  • Fabrice R Sarlegna
  • Christophe Bourdin
  • Daniel R Mestre
  • Lionel Bringoux

Abstract

Performing accurate actions such as goal-directed arm movements requires taking into account visual and body orientation cues to localize the target in space and produce appropriate reaching motor commands. We experimentally tilted the body and/or the visual scene to investigate how visual and body orientation cues are combined for the control of unseen arm movements. Subjects were asked to point toward a visual target using an upward movement during slow body and/or visual scene tilts. When the scene was tilted, final pointing errors varied as a function of the direction of the scene tilt (forward or backward). Actual forward body tilt resulted in systematic target undershoots, suggesting that the brain may have overcompensated for the biomechanical movement facilitation arising from body tilt. Combined body and visual scene tilts also affected final pointing errors according to the orientation of the visual scene. The data were further analysed using either a body-centered or a gravity-centered reference frame to encode visual scene orientation with simple additive models (i.e., ‘combined’ tilts equal to the sum of ‘single’ tilts). We found that the body-centered model could account only for some of the data regarding kinematic parameters and final errors. In contrast, the gravity-centered modeling in which the body and visual scene orientations were referred to vertical could explain all of these data. Therefore, our findings suggest that the brain uses gravity, thanks to its invariant properties, as a reference for the combination of visual and non-visual cues.

Suggested Citation

  • Cécile Scotto Di Cesare & Fabrice R Sarlegna & Christophe Bourdin & Daniel R Mestre & Lionel Bringoux, 2014. "Combined Influence of Visual Scene and Body Tilt on Arm Pointing Movements: Gravity Matters!," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0099866
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0099866
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0099866&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0099866?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marc Gueguen & Nicolas Vuillerme & Brice Isableu, 2012. "Does the Integration of Haptic and Visual Cues Reduce the Effect of a Biased Visual Reference Frame on the Subjective Head Orientation?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Teng Leng Ooi & Bing Wu & Zijiang J. He, 2001. "Distance determined by the angular declination below the horizon," Nature, Nature, vol. 414(6860), pages 197-200, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aurore Bourrelly & Joseph McIntyre & Cédric Morio & Pascal Despretz & Marion Luyat, 2016. "Perception of Affordance during Short-Term Exposure to Weightlessness in Parabolic Flight," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Courtney P. Wallin & Daniel A. Gajewski & Rebeca W. Teplitz & Sandra Mihelic Jaidzeka & John W. Philbeck, 2017. "The Roles for Prior Visual Experience and Age on the Extraction of Egocentric Distance," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(1), pages 91-99.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0099866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.