IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0099773.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Treatment Pattern of Type 2 Diabetes Differs in Two German Regions and with Patients' Socioeconomic Position

Author

Listed:
  • Teresa Tamayo
  • Heiner Claessen
  • Ina-Maria Rückert
  • Werner Maier
  • Michaela Schunk
  • Christine Meisinger
  • Andreas Mielck
  • Rolf Holle
  • Barbara Thorand
  • Maria Narres
  • Susanne Moebus
  • Amir-Abbas Mahabadi
  • Noreen Pundt
  • Bastian Krone
  • Uta Slomiany
  • Raimund Erbel
  • Karl-Heinz Jöckel
  • Wolfgang Rathmann
  • Andrea Icks

Abstract

Background: Diabetes treatment may differ by region and patients' socioeconomic position. This may be particularly true for newer drugs. However, data are highly limited. Methods: We examined pooled individual data of two population-based German studies, KORA F4 (Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg, south), and the HNR (Heinz Nixdorf Recall study, west) both carried out 2006 to 2008. To ascertain the association between region and educational level with anti-hyperglycemic medication we fitted poisson regression models with robust error variance for any and newer anti-hyperglycemic medication, adjusting for age, sex, diabetes duration, BMI, cardiovascular disease, lifestyle, and insurance status. Results: The examined sample comprised 662 participants with self-reported type 2 diabetes (KORA F4: 83 women, 111 men; HNR: 183 women, 285 men). The probability to receive any anti-hyperglycemic drug as well as to be treated with newer anti-hyperglycemic drugs such as insulin analogues, thiazolidinediones, or glinides was significantly increased in southern compared to western Germany (prevalence ratio (PR); 95% CI: 1.12; 1.02–1.22, 1.52;1.10–2.11 respectively). Individuals with lower educational level tended to receive anti-hyperglycemic drugs more likely than their better educated counterparts (PR; 95% CI univariable: 1.10; 0.99–1.22; fully adjusted: 1.10; 0.98–1.23). In contrast, lower education was associated with a lower estimated probability to receive newer drugs among those with any anti-hyperglycemic drugs (PR low vs. high education: 0.66; 0.48–0.91; fully adjusted: 0.68; 0.47–0.996). Conclusions: We found regional and individual social disparities in overall and newer anti-hyperglycemic medication which were not explained by other confounders. Further research is needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Teresa Tamayo & Heiner Claessen & Ina-Maria Rückert & Werner Maier & Michaela Schunk & Christine Meisinger & Andreas Mielck & Rolf Holle & Barbara Thorand & Maria Narres & Susanne Moebus & Amir-Abbas , 2014. "Treatment Pattern of Type 2 Diabetes Differs in Two German Regions and with Patients' Socioeconomic Position," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-11, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0099773
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099773
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0099773
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0099773&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0099773?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0099773. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.