Author
Listed:
- Hai-Yuan Xu
- Wen-Lin Xu
- Li-Qiang Wang
- Min-Bin Chen
- Hui-Ling Shen
Abstract
Background: Previous studies have yielded conflicting results regarding the relationship between p53 status and response to chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to expound the relationship between p53 status and response to chemotherapy. Methods/Findings: Thirteen previously published eligible studies, including 564 cases, were identified and included in this meta-analysis. p53 positive status (high expression of p53 protein and/or a mutant p53 gene) was associated with improved response in gastric cancer patients who received chemotherapy (good response: risk ratio [RR] = 0.704; 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 0.550–0.903; P = 0.006). In further stratified analyses, association with a good response remained in the East Asian population (RR = 0.657; 95% CI = 0.488–0.884; P = 0.005), while in the European subgroup, patients with p53 positive status tended to have a good response to chemotherapy, although this did not reach statistical significance (RR = 0.828, 95% CI = 0.525–1.305; P = 0.417). As five studies used neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) and one used neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT), we also analyzed these data, and found that p53 positive status was associated with a good response in gastric cancer patients who received chemotherapy-based neoadjuvant treatment (RR = 0.675, 95% CI = 0.463–0.985; P = 0.042). Conclusion: This meta-analysis indicated that p53 status may be a useful predictive biomarker for response to chemotherapy in gastric cancer. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes and better study designs are required to confirm our findings.
Suggested Citation
Hai-Yuan Xu & Wen-Lin Xu & Li-Qiang Wang & Min-Bin Chen & Hui-Ling Shen, 2014.
"Relationship between P53 Status and Response to Chemotherapy in Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-8, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0095371
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095371
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0095371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.