IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0092981.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Timing of Tracheostomy in Critically Ill Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Huibin Huang
  • Ying Li
  • Felinda Ariani
  • Xiaoli Chen
  • Jiandong Lin

Abstract

Objective: To compare important outcomes between early tracheostomy (ET) and late tracheostomy (LT) or prolonged intubation (PI) for critically ill patients receiving long-term ventilation during their treatment. Method: We performed computerized searches for relevant articles on PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane register of controlled trials (up to July 2013). We contacted international experts and manufacturers. We included in the study randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared ET (performed within 10 days after initiation of laryngeal intubation) and LT (after 10 days of laryngeal intubation) or PI in critically ill adult patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). Two investigators evaluated the articles; divergent opinions were resolved by consensus. Results: A meta-analysis was evaluated from nine randomized clinical trials with 2,072 participants. Compared to LT/PI, ET did not significantly reduce short-term mortality [relative risks (RR) = 0.91; 95% confidence intervals (CIs) = 0.81–1.03; p = 0.14] or long-term mortality (RR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.76–1.08; p = 0.27). Additionally, ET was not associated with a markedly reduced length of ICU stay [weighted mean difference (WMD) = −4.41 days; 95% CI = −13.44–4.63 days; p = 0.34], ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (RR = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.71–1.10; p = 0.27) or duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) (WMD = − 2.91 days; 95% CI = −7.21–1.40 days; p = 0.19). Conclusion: Among the patients requiring prolonged MV, ET showed no significant difference in clinical outcomes compared to that of the LT/PI group. But more rigorously designed and adequately powered RCTs are required to confirm it in future.

Suggested Citation

  • Huibin Huang & Ying Li & Felinda Ariani & Xiaoli Chen & Jiandong Lin, 2014. "Timing of Tracheostomy in Critically Ill Patients: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-11, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0092981
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092981
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0092981
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0092981&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0092981?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0092981. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.