IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0092265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Usage of Plant Food Supplements across Six European Countries: Findings from the PlantLIBRA Consumer Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Alicia Garcia-Alvarez
  • Bernadette Egan
  • Simone de Klein
  • Lorena Dima
  • Franco M Maggi
  • Merja Isoniemi
  • Lourdes Ribas-Barba
  • Monique M Raats
  • Eva Melanie Meissner
  • Mihaela Badea
  • Flavia Bruno
  • Maija Salmenhaara
  • Raimon Milà-Villarroel
  • Viktoria Knaze
  • Charo Hodgkins
  • Angela Marculescu
  • Liisa Uusitalo
  • Patrizia Restani
  • Lluís Serra-Majem

Abstract

Background: The popularity of botanical products is on the rise in Europe, with consumers using them to complement their diets or to maintain health, and products are taken in many different forms (e.g. teas, juices, herbal medicinal products, plant food supplements (PFS)). However there is a scarcity of data on the usage of such products at European level. Objective: To provide an overview of the characteristics and usage patterns of PFS consumers in six European countries. Design: Data on PFS usage were collected in a cross-sectional, retrospective survey of PFS consumers using a bespoke frequency of PFS usage questionnaire. Subjects/setting: A total sample of 2359 adult PFS consumers from Finland, Germany, Italy, Romania, Spain and the United Kingdom. Data analyses: Descriptive analyses were conducted, with all data stratified by gender, age, and country. Absolute frequencies, percentages and 95% confidence intervals are reported. Results: Overall, an estimated 18.8% of screened survey respondents used at least one PFS. Characteristics of PFS consumers included being older, well-educated, never having smoked and self-reporting health status as “good or very good”. Across countries, 491 different botanicals were identified in the PFS products used, with Ginkgo biloba (Ginkgo), Oenothera biennis (Evening primrose) and Cynara scolymus (Artichoke) being most frequently reported; the most popular dose forms were capsules and pills/tablets. Most consumers used one product and half of all users took single-botanical products. Some results varied across countries. Conclusions: The PlantLIBRA consumer survey is unique in reporting on usage patterns of PFS consumers in six European countries. The survey highlights the complexity of measuring the intake of such products, particularly at pan-European level. Incorporating measures of the intake of botanicals in national dietary surveys would provide much-needed data for comprehensive risk and benefit assessments at the European level.

Suggested Citation

  • Alicia Garcia-Alvarez & Bernadette Egan & Simone de Klein & Lorena Dima & Franco M Maggi & Merja Isoniemi & Lourdes Ribas-Barba & Monique M Raats & Eva Melanie Meissner & Mihaela Badea & Flavia Bruno , 2014. "Usage of Plant Food Supplements across Six European Countries: Findings from the PlantLIBRA Consumer Survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0092265
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092265
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0092265
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0092265&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0092265?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0092265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.