IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0089376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Genome-Wide Methylation Analyses in Glioblastoma Multiforme

Author

Listed:
  • Rose K Lai
  • Yanwen Chen
  • Xiaowei Guan
  • Darryl Nousome
  • Charu Sharma
  • Peter Canoll
  • Jeffrey Bruce
  • Andrew E Sloan
  • Etty Cortes
  • Jean-Paul Vonsattel
  • Tao Su
  • Lissette Delgado-Cruzata
  • Irina Gurvich
  • Regina M Santella
  • Quinn Ostrom
  • Annette Lee
  • Peter Gregersen
  • Jill Barnholtz-Sloan

Abstract

Few studies had investigated genome-wide methylation in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Our goals were to study differential methylation across the genome in gene promoters using an array-based method, as well as repetitive elements using surrogate global methylation markers. The discovery sample set for this study consisted of 54 GBM from Columbia University and Case Western Reserve University, and 24 brain controls from the New York Brain Bank. We assembled a validation dataset using methylation data of 162 TCGA GBM and 140 brain controls from dbGAP. HumanMethylation27 Analysis Bead-Chips (Illumina) were used to interrogate 26,486 informative CpG sites in both the discovery and validation datasets. Global methylation levels were assessed by analysis of L1 retrotransposon (LINE1), 5 methyl-deoxycytidine (5m-dC) and 5 hydroxylmethyl-deoxycytidine (5hm-dC) in the discovery dataset. We validated a total of 1548 CpG sites (1307 genes) that were differentially methylated in GBM compared to controls. There were more than twice as many hypomethylated genes as hypermethylated ones. Both the discovery and validation datasets found 5 tumor methylation classes. Pathway analyses showed that the top ten pathways in hypomethylated genes were all related to functions of innate and acquired immunities. Among hypermethylated pathways, transcriptional regulatory network in embryonic stem cells was the most significant. In the study of global methylation markers, 5m-dC level was the best discriminant among methylation classes, whereas in survival analyses, high level of LINE1 methylation was an independent, favorable prognostic factor in the discovery dataset. Based on a pathway approach, hypermethylation in genes that control stem cell differentiation were significant, poor prognostic factors of overall survival in both the discovery and validation datasets. Approaches that targeted these methylated genes may be a future therapeutic goal.

Suggested Citation

  • Rose K Lai & Yanwen Chen & Xiaowei Guan & Darryl Nousome & Charu Sharma & Peter Canoll & Jeffrey Bruce & Andrew E Sloan & Etty Cortes & Jean-Paul Vonsattel & Tao Su & Lissette Delgado-Cruzata & Irina , 2014. "Genome-Wide Methylation Analyses in Glioblastoma Multiforme," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-16, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0089376
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0089376
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0089376&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0089376?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0089376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.