IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0085618.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fully Automated Segmentation of the Pons and Midbrain Using Human T1 MR Brain Images

Author

Listed:
  • Salvatore Nigro
  • Antonio Cerasa
  • Giancarlo Zito
  • Paolo Perrotta
  • Francesco Chiaravalloti
  • Giulia Donzuso
  • Franceso Fera
  • Eleonora Bilotta
  • Pietro Pantano
  • Aldo Quattrone
  • the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract

Purpose: This paper describes a novel method to automatically segment the human brainstem into midbrain and pons, called LABS: Landmark-based Automated Brainstem Segmentation. LABS processes high-resolution structural magnetic resonance images (MRIs) according to a revised landmark-based approach integrated with a thresholding method, without manual interaction. Methods: This method was first tested on morphological T1-weighted MRIs of 30 healthy subjects. Its reliability was further confirmed by including neurological patients (with Alzheimer's Disease) from the ADNI repository, in whom the presence of volumetric loss within the brainstem had been previously described. Segmentation accuracies were evaluated against expert-drawn manual delineation. To evaluate the quality of LABS segmentation we used volumetric, spatial overlap and distance-based metrics. Results: The comparison between the quantitative measurements provided by LABS against manual segmentations revealed excellent results in healthy controls when considering either the midbrain (DICE measures higher that 0.9; Volume ratio around 1 and Hausdorff distance around 3) or the pons (DICE measures around 0.93; Volume ratio ranging 1.024–1.05 and Hausdorff distance around 2). Similar performances were detected for AD patients considering segmentation of the pons (DICE measures higher that 0.93; Volume ratio ranging from 0.97–0.98 and Hausdorff distance ranging 1.07–1.33), while LABS performed lower for the midbrain (DICE measures ranging 0.86–0.88; Volume ratio around 0.95 and Hausdorff distance ranging 1.71–2.15). Conclusions: Our study represents the first attempt to validate a new fully automated method for in vivo segmentation of two anatomically complex brainstem subregions. We retain that our method might represent a useful tool for future applications in clinical practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Salvatore Nigro & Antonio Cerasa & Giancarlo Zito & Paolo Perrotta & Francesco Chiaravalloti & Giulia Donzuso & Franceso Fera & Eleonora Bilotta & Pietro Pantano & Aldo Quattrone & the Alzheimer's Dis, 2014. "Fully Automated Segmentation of the Pons and Midbrain Using Human T1 MR Brain Images," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0085618
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0085618
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0085618&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0085618?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0085618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.