IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0081728.html

Improving Embryonic Stem Cell Expansion through the Combination of Perfusion and Bioprocess Model Design

Author

Listed:
  • David Yeo
  • Alexandros Kiparissides
  • Jae Min Cha
  • Cristobal Aguilar-Gallardo
  • Julia M Polak
  • Elefterios Tsiridis
  • Efstratios N Pistikopoulos
  • Athanasios Mantalaris

Abstract

Background: High proliferative and differentiation capacity renders embryonic stem cells (ESCs) a promising cell source for tissue engineering and cell-based therapies. Harnessing their potential, however, requires well-designed, efficient and reproducible expansion and differentiation protocols as well as avoiding hazardous by-products, such as teratoma formation. Traditional, standard culture methodologies are fragmented and limited in their fed-batch feeding strategies that afford a sub-optimal environment for cellular metabolism. Herein, we investigate the impact of metabolic stress as a result of inefficient feeding utilizing a novel perfusion bioreactor and a mathematical model to achieve bioprocess improvement. Methodology/Principal Findings: To characterize nutritional requirements, the expansion of undifferentiated murine ESCs (mESCs) encapsulated in hydrogels was performed in batch and perfusion cultures using bioreactors. Despite sufficient nutrient and growth factor provision, the accumulation of inhibitory metabolites resulted in the unscheduled differentiation of mESCs and a decline in their cell numbers in the batch cultures. In contrast, perfusion cultures maintained metabolite concentration below toxic levels, resulting in the robust expansion (>16-fold) of high quality ‘naïve’ mESCs within 4 days. A multi-scale mathematical model describing population segregated growth kinetics, metabolism and the expression of selected pluripotency (‘stemness’) genes was implemented to maximize information from available experimental data. A global sensitivity analysis (GSA) was employed that identified significant (6/29) model parameters and enabled model validation. Predicting the preferential propagation of undifferentiated ESCs in perfusion culture conditions demonstrates synchrony between theory and experiment. Conclusions/Significance: The limitations of batch culture highlight the importance of cellular metabolism in maintaining pluripotency, which necessitates the design of suitable ESC bioprocesses. We propose a novel investigational framework that integrates a novel perfusion culture platform (controlled metabolic conditions) with mathematical modeling (information maximization) to enhance ESC bioprocess productivity and facilitate bioprocess optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • David Yeo & Alexandros Kiparissides & Jae Min Cha & Cristobal Aguilar-Gallardo & Julia M Polak & Elefterios Tsiridis & Efstratios N Pistikopoulos & Athanasios Mantalaris, 2013. "Improving Embryonic Stem Cell Expansion through the Combination of Perfusion and Bioprocess Model Design," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-14, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0081728
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081728
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0081728
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0081728&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0081728?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John A. List, 2002. "Preference Reversals of a Different Kind: The "More Is Less" Phenomenon," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(5), pages 1636-1643, December.
    2. Hitoshi Niwa & Kazuya Ogawa & Daisuke Shimosato & Kenjiro Adachi, 2009. "A parallel circuit of LIF signalling pathways maintains pluripotency of mouse ES cells," Nature, Nature, vol. 460(7251), pages 118-122, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ginger Zhe Jin & Andrew Kato & John A. List, 2010. "That’S News To Me! Information Revelation In Professional Certification Markets," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 48(1), pages 104-122, January.
    2. John List, 2025. "Valuing Non-Marketed Goods and Services Using a List Field Experiment," Framed Field Experiments 00809, The Field Experiments Website.
    3. Sijia Liu & Vivian G. Kirby & Paul D. Berger, 2017. "NGOs¡¯ Advertising in South Africa and Implications for NGOs in China," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(1), pages 18-26, February.
    4. Chen Dong & Shuhua Fu & Rowan M. Karvas & Brian Chew & Laura A. Fischer & Xiaoyun Xing & Jessica K. Harrison & Pooja Popli & Ramakrishna Kommagani & Ting Wang & Bo Zhang & Thorold W. Theunissen, 2022. "A genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screen identifies essential and growth-restricting genes in human trophoblast stem cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Durham Yvonne & Roelofs Matthew R & Standifird Stephen S, 2004. "eBay's Buy-It-Now Function: Who, When, and How," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 1-24, October.
    6. Myriã Tatiany Neves Bast & Sergio Naruhiko Sakurai, 2016. "Uma Avaliação Empírica Dos Efeitos Dos Empréstimos Do Bndes Aos Governos Municipais Brasileiros," Anais do XLIII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 43rd Brazilian Economics Meeting] 064, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    7. Lijia Shi & Lisa A. House & Zhifeng Gao, 2013. "Impact of Purchase Intentions on Full and Partial Bids in BDM Auctions: Willingness-to-pay for Organic and Local Blueberries," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(3), pages 707-718, September.
    8. Haipeng Fu & Tingyu Wang & Xiaohui Kong & Kun Yan & Yang Yang & Jingyi Cao & Yafei Yuan & Nan Wang & Kehkooi Kee & Zhi John Lu & Qiaoran Xi, 2022. "A Nodal enhanced micropeptide NEMEP regulates glucose uptake during mesendoderm differentiation of embryonic stem cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Laura Santini & Saskia Kowald & Luis Miguel Cerron-Alvan & Michelle Huth & Anna Philina Fabing & Giovanni Sestini & Nicolas Rivron & Martin Leeb, 2024. "FoxO transcription factors actuate the formative pluripotency specific gene expression programme," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    10. Thomas Kourouxous & Thomas Bauer, 2019. "Violations of dominance in decision-making," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 12(1), pages 209-239, April.
    11. Michael S. Haigh & John A. List, 2005. "Do Professional Traders Exhibit Myopic Loss Aversion? An Experimental Analysis," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 60(1), pages 523-534, February.
    12. Mao, Wen, 2016. "Sometimes “Fee” Is Better Than “Free”: Token Promotional Pricing and Consumer Reactions to Price Promotion Offering Product Upgrades," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 173-184.
    13. John List, 2005. "Scientific Numerology, Preference Anomalies, and Environmental Policymaking," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 32(1), pages 35-53, September.
    14. James Murphy & P. Allen & Thomas Stevens & Darryl Weatherhead, 2005. "A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 30(3), pages 313-325, March.
    15. Berg, Joyce E. & Dickhaut, John W. & Rietz, Thomas A., 2010. "Preference reversals: The impact of truth-revealing monetary incentives," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 443-468, March.
    16. Alistair Munro & Danail Popov, 2013. "A portmanteau experiment on the relevance of individual decision anomalies for households," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 16(3), pages 335-348, September.
    17. Lusk Jayson L & Alexander Corinne & Rousu Matthew C., 2007. "Designing Experimental Auctions for Marketing Research: The Effect of Values, Distributions, and Mechanisms on Incentives for Truthful Bidding," Review of Marketing Science, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-32, October.
    18. Mueller-Dethard, Jan & Weber, Martin, 2020. "The Portfolio Composition Effect," CEPR Discussion Papers 15012, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    19. Eyal Gamliel & Eyal Pe'er, 2021. "When two wrongs make a right: The efficiency-consumption gap under separate vs. joint evaluations," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 16(1), pages 94-113, January.
    20. Michele J. Aquino & Seth Gershenson, 2024. "Expecting the Expected? Documenting Nostalgia Effects on Baseball Card Prices," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 25(6), pages 683-706, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0081728. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.