IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0070244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Heterogeneity of Early Parkinson’s Disease: A Cluster Analysis on Newly Diagnosed Untreated Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Erro
  • Carmine Vitale
  • Marianna Amboni
  • Marina Picillo
  • Marcello Moccia
  • Katia Longo
  • Gabriella Santangelo
  • Anna De Rosa
  • Roberto Allocca
  • Flavio Giordano
  • Giuseppe Orefice
  • Giuseppe De Michele
  • Lucio Santoro
  • Maria Teresa Pellecchia
  • Paolo Barone

Abstract

Background: The variability in the clinical phenotype of Parkinson’s disease seems to suggest the existence of several subtypes of the disease. To test this hypothesis we performed a cluster analysis using data assessing both motor and non-motor symptoms in a large cohort of newly diagnosed untreated PD patients. Methods: We collected data on demographic, motor, and the whole complex of non-motor symptoms from 100 consecutive newly diagnosed untreated outpatients. Statistical cluster analysis allowed the identification of different subgroups, which have been subsequently explored. Results: The data driven approach identified four distinct groups of patients, we have labeled: 1) Benign Pure Motor; 2) Benign mixed Motor-Non-Motor; 3) Non-Motor Dominant; and 4) Motor Dominant. Conclusion: Our results confirmed the existence of different subgroups of early PD patients. Cluster analysis revealed the presence of distinct subtypes of patients profiled according to the relevance of both motor and non-motor symptoms. Identification of such subtypes may have important implications for generating pathogenetic hypotheses and therapeutic strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Erro & Carmine Vitale & Marianna Amboni & Marina Picillo & Marcello Moccia & Katia Longo & Gabriella Santangelo & Anna De Rosa & Roberto Allocca & Flavio Giordano & Giuseppe Orefice & Giuseppe, 2013. "The Heterogeneity of Early Parkinson’s Disease: A Cluster Analysis on Newly Diagnosed Untreated Patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-8, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0070244
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0070244
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0070244&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0070244?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0070244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.