IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0070044.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bisphosphonates in the Adjuvant Setting of Breast Cancer Therapy—Effect on Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Irit Ben-Aharon
  • Liat Vidal
  • Shulamith Rizel
  • Rinat Yerushalmi
  • Ofer Shpilberg
  • Aaron Sulkes
  • Salomon M Stemmer

Abstract

Background: The role of bisphosphonates (BP) in early breast cancer (BC) has been considered controversial. We performed a meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that appraised the effects of BP on survival in early BC. Methods: RCTs were identified by searching the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE databases and conference proceedings. Hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and relative risks of adverse events were estimated and pooled. Results: Thirteen trials met the inclusion criteria, evaluating a total of 15,762 patients. Meta-analysis of ten trials which reported OS revealed no statistically significant benefit in OS for BP (HR 0.89, 95% CI = 0.79 to 1.01). Meta-analysis of nine trials which reported the DFS revealed no benefit in DFS (HR 0.95 (0.81–1.12)). Meta-analysis upon menopausal status showed a statistically significant better DFS in the BP-treated patients (HR 0.81(0.69–0.95)). In meta-regression, chemotherapy was negatively associated with HR of survival. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis indicates a positive effect for adjuvant BP on survival only in postmenopausal patients. Meta-regression demonstrated a negative association between chemotherapy use BP effect on survival. Further large scale RCTs are warranted to unravel the specific subgroups that would benefit from the addition of BP in the adjuvant setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Irit Ben-Aharon & Liat Vidal & Shulamith Rizel & Rinat Yerushalmi & Ofer Shpilberg & Aaron Sulkes & Salomon M Stemmer, 2013. "Bisphosphonates in the Adjuvant Setting of Breast Cancer Therapy—Effect on Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-9, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0070044
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0070044
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0070044&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0070044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0070044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.