IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0069924.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Evolution from DNA Sequences

Author

Listed:
  • W Timothy J White
  • Bojian Zhong
  • David Penny

Abstract

We demonstrate quantitatively that, as predicted by evolutionary theory, sequences of homologous proteins from different species converge as we go further and further back in time. The converse, a non-evolutionary model can be expressed as probabilities, and the test works for chloroplast, nuclear and mitochondrial sequences, as well as for sequences that diverged at different time depths. Even on our conservative test, the probability that chance could produce the observed levels of ancestral convergence for just one of the eight datasets of 51 proteins is ≈1×10−19 and combined over 8 datasets is ≈1×10−132. By comparison, there are about 1080 protons in the universe, hence the probability that the sequences could have been produced by a process involving unrelated ancestral sequences is about 1050 lower than picking, among all protons, the same proton at random twice in a row. A non-evolutionary control model shows no convergence, and only a small number of parameters are required to account for the observations. It is time that that researchers insisted that doubters put up testable alternatives to evolution.

Suggested Citation

  • W Timothy J White & Bojian Zhong & David Penny, 2013. "Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Evolution from DNA Sequences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-9, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0069924
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0069924
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0069924&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0069924?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Douglas L. Theobald, 2010. "A formal test of the theory of universal common ancestry," Nature, Nature, vol. 465(7295), pages 219-222, May.
    2. David Penny, 2011. "Darwin’s Theory of Descent with Modification, versus the Biblical Tree of Life," Working Papers id:4404, eSocialSciences.
    3. Gregory C. Finnigan & Victor Hanson-Smith & Tom H. Stevens & Joseph W. Thornton, 2012. "Evolution of increased complexity in a molecular machine," Nature, Nature, vol. 481(7381), pages 360-364, January.
    4. Russell Garwood, 2012. "Reach out to defend evolution," Nature, Nature, vol. 485(7398), pages 281-281, May.
    5. Chris Rapley, 2012. "Time to raft up," Nature, Nature, vol. 488(7413), pages 583-585, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0069924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.