IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0069238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Aetiological Role of Human Papillomavirus in Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Surabhi S Liyanage
  • Bayzidur Rahman
  • Iman Ridda
  • Anthony T Newall
  • Sepehr N Tabrizi
  • Suzanne M Garland
  • Eva Segelov
  • Holly Seale
  • Philip J Crowe
  • Aye Moa
  • C Raina MacIntyre

Abstract

Background: The aetiological role of human papillomavirus (HPV) in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) has been widely researched for more than three decades, with conflicting findings. In the absence of a large, adequately powered single case-control study, a meta-analysis of all available case-control studies is the most rigorous way of identifying any potential association between HPV and OSCC. We present the first global meta-analysis of case-control studies investigating the role of HPV in OSCC. Methods: Case-control studies investigating OSCC tissue for presence of HPV DNA were identified. 21 case-control studies analyzing a total of 1223 cases and 1415 controls, met our inclusion criteria. HPV detection rates were tabulated for each study and all studies were assessed for quality. The random effects method was used to pool the odds ratios (OR). Results: From all OSCC specimens included in this meta-analysis, 35% (426/1223) were positive for HPV DNA. The pooled OR for an HPV-OSCC association was 3.04 (95% CI 2.20 to 4.20). Meta-regression analysis did not find a significant association between OR and any of the quality domains. Influence analysis was non-significant for the effect of individual studies on the pooled estimate. Studies conducted in countries with low to medium OSCC incidence showed a stronger relationship (OR 4.65, 95% CI 2.47 to 8.76) than regions of high OSCC incidence (OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.80 to 3.91). Conclusions: Uncertainty around the aetiological role of HPV in OSCC is due largely to the small number and scale of appropriately designed studies. Our meta-analysis of these studies suggests that HPV increases the risk of OSCC three-fold. This study provides the strongest evidence to date of an HPV-OSCC association. The importance of these findings is that prophylactic vaccination could be of public health benefit in prevention of OSCC in countries with high OSCC incidence.

Suggested Citation

  • Surabhi S Liyanage & Bayzidur Rahman & Iman Ridda & Anthony T Newall & Sepehr N Tabrizi & Suzanne M Garland & Eva Segelov & Holly Seale & Philip J Crowe & Aye Moa & C Raina MacIntyre, 2013. "The Aetiological Role of Human Papillomavirus in Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-12, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0069238
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0069238
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0069238&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0069238?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Verônica Colpani & Frederico Soares Falcetta & Augusto Bacelo Bidinotto & Natália Luiza Kops & Maicon Falavigna & Luciano Serpa Hammes & Adele Schwartz Benzaken & Ana Goretti Kalume Maranhão & Carla M, 2020. "Prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-34, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0069238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.