IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0068613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Error Correcting Mechanisms during Antisaccades: Contribution of Online Control during Primary Saccades and Offline Control via Secondary Saccades

Author

Listed:
  • Harleen Bedi
  • Herbert C Goltz
  • Agnes M F Wong
  • Manokaraananthan Chandrakumar
  • Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo

Abstract

Errors in eye movements can be corrected during the ongoing saccade through in-flight modifications (i.e., online control), or by programming a secondary eye movement (i.e., offline control). In a reflexive saccade task, the oculomotor system can use extraretinal information (i.e., efference copy) online to correct errors in the primary saccade, and offline retinal information to generate a secondary corrective saccade. The purpose of this study was to examine the error correction mechanisms in the antisaccade task. The roles of extraretinal and retinal feedback in maintaining eye movement accuracy were investigated by presenting visual feedback at the spatial goal of the antisaccade. We found that online control for antisaccade is not affected by the presence of visual feedback; that is whether visual feedback is present or not, the duration of the deceleration interval was extended and significantly correlated with reduced antisaccade endpoint error. We postulate that the extended duration of deceleration is a feature of online control during volitional saccades to improve their endpoint accuracy. We found that secondary saccades were generated more frequently in the antisaccade task compared to the reflexive saccade task. Furthermore, we found evidence for a greater contribution from extraretinal sources of feedback in programming the secondary “corrective” saccades in the antisaccade task. Nonetheless, secondary saccades were more corrective for the remaining antisaccade amplitude error in the presence of visual feedback of the target. Taken together, our results reveal a distinctive online error control strategy through an extension of the deceleration interval in the antisaccade task. Target feedback does not improve online control, rather it improves the accuracy of secondary saccades in the antisaccade task.

Suggested Citation

  • Harleen Bedi & Herbert C Goltz & Agnes M F Wong & Manokaraananthan Chandrakumar & Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo, 2013. "Error Correcting Mechanisms during Antisaccades: Contribution of Online Control during Primary Saccades and Offline Control via Secondary Saccades," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-10, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0068613
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0068613
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0068613&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0068613?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Madeleine Schlag-Rey & Nelly Amador & Henry Sanchez & John Schlag, 1997. "Antisaccade performance predicted by neuronal activity in the supplementary eye field," Nature, Nature, vol. 390(6658), pages 398-401, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas V Wiecki & Chrystalina A Antoniades & Alexander Stevenson & Christopher Kennard & Beth Borowsky & Gail Owen & Blair Leavitt & Raymund Roos & Alexandra Durr & Sarah J Tabrizi & Michael J Frank, 2016. "A Computational Cognitive Biomarker for Early-Stage Huntington’s Disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0068613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.