IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0066568.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interleukin-10 −592C/A, −819C/T and −1082A/G Polymorphisms with Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A HuGE Review and Meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yanyin Hua
  • Jie Shen
  • Yingxiang Song
  • Yubo Xing
  • Xiao Ye

Abstract

Background: Several studies have been conducted in recent years to evaluate the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and polymorphisms of interleukin (IL)-10. However, the results remain conflicting rather than conclusive. This meta-analysis aimed to summarize the current evidence from case-control studies that evaluated this association. Methods: We carried out a search in Medline, EMBASE, and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database for relevant studies. Data were extracted using a standardized form and pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the strength of the association. Results: 10 studies were included in our meta-analysis and systemic review. Our meta-analysis indicated that IL-10 −1082A/G polymorphism was associated with the risk of T2DM (GA vs. AA: OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.03–1.14; GA/GG vs. AA: OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.05–1.41), whereas there was no association between IL-10 −592C/A (CC/CA vs. AA: OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.59–1.93) or -819C/T (CC/CT vs. TT: OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.49–1.75) polymorphism and T2DM risk was found in our study. Conclusions: This meta-analysis provides strong evidence that IL-10 −1082A/G polymorphism associated with risk of T2DM. However, no association of the IL-10 −592C/A or −819C/T polymorphism with T2DM risk was found. Additional well-designed large studies were required for the validation of our results.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanyin Hua & Jie Shen & Yingxiang Song & Yubo Xing & Xiao Ye, 2013. "Interleukin-10 −592C/A, −819C/T and −1082A/G Polymorphisms with Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A HuGE Review and Meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-6, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0066568
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066568
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0066568
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0066568&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0066568?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0066568. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.