IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0065778.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The MPO−463G>A Polymorphism and Lung Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis Based on 22 Case–Control Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Jun-Ping Yang
  • Wen-Bo Wang
  • Xiao-Xi Yang
  • Lei Yang
  • Li Ren
  • Fu-Xiang Zhou
  • Liu Hu
  • Wei He
  • Bai-Yu Li
  • Yan Zhu
  • Huan-Gang Jiang
  • Yun-Feng Zhou

Abstract

Background: Myeloperoxidase (MPO) is an endogenous oxidant enzyme that produces reactive oxygen species (ROS) and may be involved in lung carcinogenesis. The MPO−463G>A polymorphism influences MPO transcription and has been associated with lung cancer susceptibility. However, the association between the MPO−463G>A polymorphism and lung cancer risk remains controversial. Method: To investigate the effect of this polymorphism on lung cancer susceptibility, we performed a meta-analysis based on 22 published case–control studies including 7,520 patients with lung cancer and 8,600 controls. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of the association. Results: Overall, there was no evidence for significant association between MPO−463G>A polymorphism and lung cancer susceptibility (for AA versus GG: OR = 0.91, 95%CI = 0.67–1.24; for GA versus GG: OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.78–0.98; for AA/GA versus GG: OR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.80–1.01; for AA versus GA/GG: OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.72–1.28). In the stratified analyses by ethnicity, source of controls and smoking status, we also did not find any significant association between them. Conclusions: In summary, this meta-analysis suggests MPO−463G>A polymorphism may not be a risk factor for developing lung cancer. However, further prospective well-designed population-based studies with larger sample size are expected to validate the results.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun-Ping Yang & Wen-Bo Wang & Xiao-Xi Yang & Lei Yang & Li Ren & Fu-Xiang Zhou & Liu Hu & Wei He & Bai-Yu Li & Yan Zhu & Huan-Gang Jiang & Yun-Feng Zhou, 2013. "The MPO−463G>A Polymorphism and Lung Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis Based on 22 Case–Control Studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-9, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0065778
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065778
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0065778
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0065778&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0065778?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0065778. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.