IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0065340.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monitoring Functional Capability of Individuals with Lower Limb Amputations Using Mobile Phones

Author

Listed:
  • Mark V Albert
  • Cliodhna McCarthy
  • Juliana Valentin
  • Megan Herrmann
  • Konrad Kording
  • Arun Jayaraman

Abstract

To be effective, a prescribed prosthetic device must match the functional requirements and capabilities of each patient. These capabilities are usually assessed by a clinician and reported by the Medicare K-level designation of mobility. However, it is not clear how the K-level designation objectively relates to the use of prostheses outside of a clinical environment. Here, we quantify participant activity using mobile phones and relate activity measured during real world activity to the assigned K-levels. We observe a correlation between K-level and the proportion of moderate to high activity over the course of a week. This relationship suggests that accelerometry-based technologies such as mobile phones can be used to evaluate real world activity for mobility assessment. Quantifying everyday activity promises to improve assessment of real world prosthesis use, leading to a better matching of prostheses to individuals and enabling better evaluations of future prosthetic devices.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark V Albert & Cliodhna McCarthy & Juliana Valentin & Megan Herrmann & Konrad Kording & Arun Jayaraman, 2013. "Monitoring Functional Capability of Individuals with Lower Limb Amputations Using Mobile Phones," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-6, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0065340
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0065340
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0065340&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0065340?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0065340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.