Author
Listed:
- Matthew E Falagas
- Giannoula S Tansarli
- Anastasios Kapaskelis
- Konstantinos Z Vardakas
Abstract
Objective: To examine the impact of VAC therapy on mortality of patients with sternal wound infections after cardiothoracic surgery. Summary Background Data: Controversial results regarding mortality of patients with sternal wound infections were published. Methods: We performed a systematic search in PubMed and Scopus. Mortality was the primary outcome of the meta-analysis. Recurrences, complications and length of stay were secondary outcomes. Results: Twenty-two retrospective studies including 2467 patients were eligible for inclusion. Patients treated with VAC had significantly lower mortality compared to those treated without VAC [2233 patients, RR = 0.40, (95% CI 0.28, 0.57)]. This finding was consistent regardless of the study design, the exclusion of studies with positive findings, the criteria for establishment of the compared groups, the time of mortality assessment or the type of infections under study, provided that adequate data was available. VAC therapy was associated with fewer recurrences (RR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.19–0.59). The meta-analysis did not show any difference in the length of stay (RR = −2.25, 95% CI: −7.52–3.02). Conclusions: VAC therapy was associated with lower mortality than other surgical techniques in retrospective cohorts of patients with DSWIs following cardiothoracic surgery.
Suggested Citation
Matthew E Falagas & Giannoula S Tansarli & Anastasios Kapaskelis & Konstantinos Z Vardakas, 2013.
"Impact of Vacuum-Assisted Closure (VAC) Therapy on Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Sternal Wound Infections: A Meta-Analysis of Non-Randomized Studies,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-10, May.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0064741
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064741
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0064741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.