IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0062492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trend of Urban-Rural Disparities in Hospice Utilization in Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Yi-Hsuan Lin
  • Yi-Chun Chen
  • Yen-Han Tseng
  • Ming-Hwai Lin
  • Shinn-Jang Hwang
  • Tzeng-Ji Chen
  • Li-Fang Chou

Abstract

Aims: The palliative care has spread rapidly worldwide in the recent two decades. The development of hospice services in rural areas usually lags behind that in urban areas. The aim of our study was to investigate whether the urban-rural disparity widens in a country with a hospital-based hospice system. Methods: From the nationwide claims database within the National Health Insurance in Taiwan, admissions to hospices from 2000 to 2006 were identified. Hospices and patients in each year were analyzed according to geographic location and residence. Results: A total of 26,292 cancer patients had been admitted to hospices. The proportion of rural patients to all patients increased with time from 17.8% in 2000 to 25.7% in 2006. Although the numbers of beds and the utilizations in both urban and rural hospices expanded rapidly, the increasing trend in rural areas was more marked than that in urban areas. However, still two-thirds (898/1,357) of rural patients were admitted to urban hospices in 2006. Conclusions: The gap of hospice utilizations between urban and rural areas in Taiwan did not widen with time. There was room for improvement in sufficient supply of rural hospices or efficient referral of rural patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi-Hsuan Lin & Yi-Chun Chen & Yen-Han Tseng & Ming-Hwai Lin & Shinn-Jang Hwang & Tzeng-Ji Chen & Li-Fang Chou, 2013. "Trend of Urban-Rural Disparities in Hospice Utilization in Taiwan," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-6, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0062492
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062492
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062492
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062492&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0062492?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0062492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.