IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0060137.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

cis-Regulatory Complexity within a Large Non-Coding Region in the Drosophila Genome

Author

Listed:
  • Mukta Kundu
  • Alexander Kuzin
  • Tzu-Yang Lin
  • Chi-Hon Lee
  • Thomas Brody
  • Ward F Odenwald

Abstract

Analysis of cis-regulatory enhancers has revealed that they consist of clustered blocks of highly conserved sequences. Although most characterized enhancers reside near their target genes, a growing number of studies have shown that enhancers located over 50 kb from their minimal promoter(s) are required for appropriate gene expression and many of these ‘long-range’ enhancers are found in genomic regions that are devoid of identified exons. To gain insight into the complexity of Drosophila cis-regulatory sequences within exon-poor regions, we have undertaken an evolutionary analysis of 39 of these regions located throughout the genome. This survey revealed that within these genomic expanses, clusters of conserved sequence blocks (CSBs) are positioned once every 1.1 kb, on average, and that a typical cluster contains multiple (5 to 30 or more) CSBs that have been maintained for at least 190 My of evolutionary divergence. As an initial step toward assessing the cis-regulatory activity of conserved clusters within gene-free genomic expanses, we have tested the in-vivo enhancer activity of 19 consecutive CSB clusters located in the middle of a 115 kb gene-poor region on the 3rd chromosome. Our studies revealed that each cluster functions independently as a specific spatial/temporal enhancer. In total, the enhancers possess a diversity of regulatory functions, including dynamically activating expression in defined patterns within subsets of cells in discrete regions of the embryo, larvae and/or adult. We also observed that many of the enhancers are multifunctional–that is, they activate expression during multiple developmental stages. By extending these results to the rest of the Drosophila genome, which contains over 70,000 non-coding CSB clusters, we suggest that most function as enhancers.

Suggested Citation

  • Mukta Kundu & Alexander Kuzin & Tzu-Yang Lin & Chi-Hon Lee & Thomas Brody & Ward F Odenwald, 2013. "cis-Regulatory Complexity within a Large Non-Coding Region in the Drosophila Genome," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0060137
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0060137
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0060137&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0060137?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Len A. Pennacchio & Nadav Ahituv & Alan M. Moses & Shyam Prabhakar & Marcelo A. Nobrega & Malak Shoukry & Simon Minovitsky & Inna Dubchak & Amy Holt & Keith D. Lewis & Ingrid Plajzer-Frick & Jennifer , 2006. "In vivo enhancer analysis of human conserved non-coding sequences," Nature, Nature, vol. 444(7118), pages 499-502, November.
    2. Nicolás Frankel & Gregory K. Davis & Diego Vargas & Shu Wang & François Payre & David L. Stern, 2010. "Phenotypic robustness conferred by apparently redundant transcriptional enhancers," Nature, Nature, vol. 466(7305), pages 490-493, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Buki Kwon & Mervin M. Fansler & Neil D. Patel & Jihye Lee & Weirui Ma & Christine Mayr, 2022. "Enhancers regulate 3′ end processing activity to control expression of alternative 3′UTR isoforms," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Victor Lopez Soriano & Alfredo Dueñas Rey & Rajarshi Mukherjee & Frauke Coppieters & Miriam Bauwens & Andy Willaert & Elfride De Baere, 2024. "Multi-omics analysis in human retina uncovers ultraconserved cis-regulatory elements at rare eye disease loci," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Matthew J Harder & Julie Hix & Wendy M Reeves & Michael T Veeman, 2021. "Ciona Brachyury proximal and distal enhancers have different FGF dose-response relationships," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-23, January.
    4. Andrew T Kwon & Alice Yi Chou & David J Arenillas & Wyeth W Wasserman, 2011. "Validation of Skeletal Muscle cis-Regulatory Module Predictions Reveals Nucleotide Composition Bias in Functional Enhancers," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Timothy H-C Hsiau & Claudiu Diaconu & Connie A Myers & Jongwoo Lee & Constance L Cepko & Joseph C Corbo, 2007. "The Cis-regulatory Logic of the Mammalian Photoreceptor Transcriptional Network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(7), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Iksoo Huh & Isabel Mendizabal & Taesung Park & Soojin V Yi, 2018. "Functional conservation of sequence determinants at rapidly evolving regulatory regions across mammals," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Dohoon Lee & Jeewon Yang & Sun Kim, 2022. "Learning the histone codes with large genomic windows and three-dimensional chromatin interactions using transformer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Markus Götz & Olivier Messina & Sergio Espinola & Jean-Bernard Fiche & Marcelo Nollmann, 2022. "Multiple parameters shape the 3D chromatin structure of single nuclei at the doc locus in Drosophila," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0060137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.