IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0058790.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Harnessing Clinical Psychiatric Data with an Electronic Assessment Tool (OPCRIT+): The Utility of Symptom Dimensions

Author

Listed:
  • Philip James Brittain
  • Sarah Elizabeth Margaret Lobo
  • James Rucker
  • Myanthi Amarasinghe
  • Anantha Padmanabha Pillai Anilkumar
  • Martin Baggaley
  • Pallavi Banerjee
  • Jenny Bearn
  • Matthew Broadbent
  • Matthew Butler
  • Colin Donald Campbell
  • Anthony James Cleare
  • Luiz Dratcu
  • Sophia Frangou
  • Fiona Gaughran
  • Matthew Goldin
  • Annika Henke
  • Nikola Kern
  • Abdallah Krayem
  • Faiza Mufti
  • Ronan McIvor
  • Humphrey Needham-Bennett
  • Stuart Newman
  • Dele Olajide
  • David O’Flynn
  • Ranga Rao
  • Ijaz Ur Rehman
  • Gertrude Seneviratne
  • Daniel Stahl
  • Sajid Suleman
  • Janet Treasure
  • John Tully
  • David Veale
  • Robert Stewart
  • Peter McGuffin
  • Simon Lovestone
  • Matthew Hotopf
  • Gunter Schumann

Abstract

Progress in personalised psychiatry is dependent on researchers having access to systematic and accurately acquired symptom data across clinical diagnoses. We have developed a structured psychiatric assessment tool, OPCRIT+, that is being introduced into the electronic medical records system of the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust which can help to achieve this. In this report we examine the utility of the symptom data being collected with the tool. Cross-sectional mental state data from a mixed-diagnostic cohort of 876 inpatients was subjected to a principal components analysis (PCA). Six components, explaining 46% of the variance in recorded symptoms, were extracted. The components represented dimensions of mania, depression, positive symptoms, anxiety, negative symptoms and disorganization. As indicated by component scores, different clinical diagnoses demonstrated distinct symptom profiles characterized by wide-ranging levels of severity. When comparing the predictive value of symptoms against diagnosis for a variety of clinical outcome measures (e.g. ‘Overactive, aggressive behaviour’), symptoms proved superior in five instances (R2 range: 0.06–0.28) whereas diagnosis was best just once (R2∶0.25). This report demonstrates that symptom data being routinely gathered in an NHS trust, when documented on the appropriate tool, have considerable potential for onward use in a variety of clinical and research applications via representation as dimensions of psychopathology.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip James Brittain & Sarah Elizabeth Margaret Lobo & James Rucker & Myanthi Amarasinghe & Anantha Padmanabha Pillai Anilkumar & Martin Baggaley & Pallavi Banerjee & Jenny Bearn & Matthew Broadbent , 2013. "Harnessing Clinical Psychiatric Data with an Electronic Assessment Tool (OPCRIT+): The Utility of Symptom Dimensions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-8, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0058790
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058790
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0058790
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0058790&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0058790?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0058790. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.