IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0057830.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Novel Statistical Prognostic Score Model That Includes Serum CXCL5 Levels and Clinical Classification Predicts Risk of Disease Progression and Survival of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Haibo Zhang
  • Weixiong Xia
  • Xing Lu
  • Rui Sun
  • Lin Wang
  • Lisheng Zheng
  • Yanfang Ye
  • Yingna Bao
  • Yanqun Xiang
  • Xiang Guo

Abstract

Background: Aberrant expression of C-X-C motif chemokine 5 (CXCL5) contributes to the progression of various cancers. This study analyzed the clinical significance of serum CXCL5 (sCXCL5) levels of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients, with the goal of building a novel prognostic score model. Experimental Design: Serum samples were collected prior to treatment from 290 NPC patients for the detection of sCXCL5 with ELISA. Half of the patients (n = 145) were randomly assigned to the training set to generate the sCXCL5 cutoff point using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis, while the other half (n = 145) were assigned to the testing set for validation. Associations between sCXCL5 levels and clinical characteristics were analyzed. A prognostic score model was built using independent predictors derived from multivariate analysis. A concordance index (C-Index) was used to evaluate prognostic ability. Results: The sCXCL5 cutoff point was 0.805 ng/ml. Sex, age, histology, T classification, clinical classification and local recurrence were not associated with sCXCL5 levels. However, sCXCL5 levels were positively associated with N classification, distant metastasis and disease progression (P

Suggested Citation

  • Haibo Zhang & Weixiong Xia & Xing Lu & Rui Sun & Lin Wang & Lisheng Zheng & Yanfang Ye & Yingna Bao & Yanqun Xiang & Xiang Guo, 2013. "A Novel Statistical Prognostic Score Model That Includes Serum CXCL5 Levels and Clinical Classification Predicts Risk of Disease Progression and Survival of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-9, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0057830
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057830
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0057830
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0057830&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0057830?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0057830. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.