IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0054431.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Parenteral Selenium Supplementation in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ting-Shuo Huang
  • Yu-Chiau Shyu
  • Huang-Yang Chen
  • Li-Mei Lin
  • Chia-Ying Lo
  • Shin-Sheng Yuan
  • Pei-Jer Chen

Abstract

Background: It is currently unclear whether parenteral selenium supplementation should be recommended in the management of critically ill patients. Here we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of parenteral selenium supplementation on clinical outcomes. Methods/Principal Findings: Randomized trials investigating parenteral selenium supplementation administered in addition to standard of care to critically ill patients were included. CENTRAL, Medline, EMBASE, the Science Citation Index, and CINAHL were searched with complementary manual searches. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Trials published in any language were included. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. A third author was consulted to resolve disagreements and for quality assurance. Twelve trials were included and meta-analysis was performed on nine trials that recruited critically ill septic patients. These comprised 965 participants in total. Of these, 148 patients (30.7%) in the treatment groups, and 180 patients (37.3%) in control groups died. Parenteral selenium treatment significantly reduced all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis (relative risk [RR] 0.83, 95% CI 0.70–0.99, p = 0.04, I2 = 0%). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that the administration schedule employing longer duration (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63–0.94, p = 0.01, I2 = 0%), loading boluses (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.58–0.94, p = 0.01, I2 = 0%) or high-dose selenium treatment (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61–0.99, p = 0.04, I2 = 0%) might be associated with a lower mortality risk. There was no evidence of adverse events. Conclusions/Significance: Parenteral selenium supplementation reduces risk of mortality among critically ill patients with sepsis. Owing to the varied methodological quality of the studies, future high-quality randomized trials that directly focus on the effect of adequate-duration of parenteral selenium supplementation for severe septic patients are needed to confirm our results. Clinicians should consider these findings when treating this high-risk population. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO 2011; CRD42011001768

Suggested Citation

  • Ting-Shuo Huang & Yu-Chiau Shyu & Huang-Yang Chen & Li-Mei Lin & Chia-Ying Lo & Shin-Sheng Yuan & Pei-Jer Chen, 2013. "Effect of Parenteral Selenium Supplementation in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0054431
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0054431
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0054431&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0054431?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liuquan Zhang & Yanbin Guo & Kehong Liang & Zhongqiu Hu & Xiangdong Sun & Yong Fang & Xiaohong Mei & Hongqing Yin & Xianjin Liu & Baiyi Lu, 2020. "Determination of Selenium in Common and Selenium-Rich Rice from Different Areas in China and Assessment of Their Dietary Intake," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-15, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0054431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.