IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0052681.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coffee Consumption and Risk of Breast Cancer: An Up-To-Date Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Xiu Juan Li
  • Zhao Jun Ren
  • Jian Wei Qin
  • Jian Hua Zhao
  • Jin Hai Tang
  • Ming Hua Ji
  • Jian Zhong Wu

Abstract

Objectives: This updated meta-analysis was conducted to assess the association between coffee consumption and breast cancer risk. Methods: We conducted a systematic search updated July 2012 to identify observational studies providing quantitative estimates for breast cancer risk in relation to coffee consumption. Pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model, and generalized least square trend estimation was used to assess dose–response relationships. Results: A total of 26 studies (16 cohort and 10 case–control studies) on coffee intake with 49497 breast cancer cases were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled RR showed a borderline significant influence of highest coffee consumption (RR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.93–1.00), low-to moderate coffee consumption (RR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.95–1.04), or an increment of 2 cups/day of coffee consumption (RR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.97–1.00) on the risk of breast cancer. In stratified analysis, a significant inverse association was observed in ER-negative subgroup. However, no significant association was noted in the others. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that increased coffee intake is not associated with a significantly reduced risk of breast cancer, but we observe an inverse association in ER-negative subgroup analysis. More large studies are needed to determine subgroups to obtain more valuable data on coffee drinking and breast cancer risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiu Juan Li & Zhao Jun Ren & Jian Wei Qin & Jian Hua Zhao & Jin Hai Tang & Ming Hua Ji & Jian Zhong Wu, 2013. "Coffee Consumption and Risk of Breast Cancer: An Up-To-Date Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-7, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0052681
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052681
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052681&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0052681?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0052681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.