IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0052343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Difficult Is It to Fold a Knotted Protein? In Silico Insights from Surface-Tethered Folding Experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel A Soler
  • Patrícia F N Faísca

Abstract

We explore the effect of surface tethering on the folding process of a lattice protein that contains a trefoil knot in its native structure via Monte Carlo simulations. We show that the outcome of the tethering experiment depends critically on which terminus is used to link the protein to a chemically inert plane. In particular, if surface tethering occurs at the bead that is closer to the knotted core the folding rate becomes exceedingly slow and the protein is not able to find the native structure in all the attempted folding trajectories. Such low folding efficiency is also apparent from the analysis of the probability of knot formation, pknot, as a function of nativeness. Indeed, pknot increases abruptly from ∼0 to ∼1 only when the protein has more than 80% of its native contacts formed, showing that a highly compact conformation must undergo substantial structural re-arrangement in order to get effectively knotted. When the protein is surface tethered by the bead that is placed more far away from the knotted core pknot is higher than in the other folding setups (including folding in the bulk), especially if conformations are highly native-like. These results show that the mobility of the terminus closest to the knotted core is critical for successful folding of trefoil proteins, which, in turn, highlights the importance of a knotting mechanism that is based on a threading movement of this terminus through a knotting loop. The results reported here predict that if this movement is blocked, knotting occurs via an alternative mechanism, the so-called spindle mechanism, which is prone to misfolding. Our simulations show that in the three considered folding setups the formation of the knot is typically a late event in the folding process. We discuss the implications of our findings for co-translational folding of knotted trefoils.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel A Soler & Patrícia F N Faísca, 2012. "How Difficult Is It to Fold a Knotted Protein? In Silico Insights from Surface-Tethered Folding Experiments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0052343
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052343
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052343&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0052343?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William R. Taylor, 2000. "A deeply knotted protein structure and how it might fold," Nature, Nature, vol. 406(6798), pages 916-919, August.
    2. Tatjana Škrbić & Cristian Micheletti & Pietro Faccioli, 2012. "The Role of Non-Native Interactions in the Folding of Knotted Proteins," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-12, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miguel A Soler & Patrícia F N Faísca, 2013. "Effects of Knots on Protein Folding Properties," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-10, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miguel A Soler & Patrícia F N Faísca, 2013. "Effects of Knots on Protein Folding Properties," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-10, September.
    2. Tatjana Škrbić & Cristian Micheletti & Pietro Faccioli, 2012. "The Role of Non-Native Interactions in the Folding of Knotted Proteins," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-12, June.
    3. Nick Kinney & Molly Hickman & Ramu Anandakrishnan & Harold R Garner, 2020. "Crossing complexity of space-filling curves reveals entanglement of S-phase DNA," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Ye Lei & Zhaoyong Li & Guangcheng Wu & Lijie Zhang & Lu Tong & Tianyi Tong & Qiong Chen & Lingxiang Wang & Chenqi Ge & Yuxi Wei & Yuanjiang Pan & Andrew C.-H. Sue & Linjun Wang & Feihe Huang & Hao Li, 2022. "A trefoil knot self-templated through imination in water," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-7, December.
    5. Lindsey A. Doyle & Brittany Takushi & Ryan D. Kibler & Lukas F. Milles & Carolina T. Orozco & Jonathan D. Jones & Sophie E. Jackson & Barry L. Stoddard & Philip Bradley, 2023. "De novo design of knotted tandem repeat proteins," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Silvio a Beccara & Tatjana Škrbić & Roberto Covino & Cristian Micheletti & Pietro Faccioli, 2013. "Folding Pathways of a Knotted Protein with a Realistic Atomistic Force Field," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-9, March.
    7. Rhonald C Lua & Alexander Y Grosberg, 2006. "Statistics of Knots, Geometry of Conformations, and Evolution of Proteins," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(5), pages 1-8, May.
    8. Zhiwen Li & Jingjing Zhang & Gao Li & Richard J. Puddephatt, 2024. "Self-assembly of the smallest and tightest molecular trefoil knot," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-6, December.
    9. Michael C Prentiss & David J Wales & Peter G Wolynes, 2010. "The Energy Landscape, Folding Pathways and the Kinetics of a Knotted Protein," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-12, July.
    10. Alexander Begun & Sergei Liubimov & Alexander Molochkov & Antti J Niemi, 2021. "On topology and knotty entanglement in protein folding," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0052343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.