IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0050200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

eThread: A Highly Optimized Machine Learning-Based Approach to Meta-Threading and the Modeling of Protein Tertiary Structures

Author

Listed:
  • Michal Brylinski
  • Daswanth Lingam

Abstract

Template-based modeling that employs various meta-threading techniques is currently the most accurate, and consequently the most commonly used, approach for protein structure prediction. Despite the evident progress in this field, accurate structure models cannot be constructed for a significant fraction of gene products, thus the development of new algorithms is required. Here, we describe the development, optimization and large-scale benchmarking of eThread, a highly accurate meta-threading procedure for the identification of structural templates and the construction of corresponding target-to-template alignments. eThread integrates ten state-of-the-art threading/fold recognition algorithms in a local environment and extensively uses various machine learning techniques to carry out fully automated template-based protein structure modeling. Tertiary structure prediction employs two protocols based on widely used modeling algorithms: Modeller and TASSER-Lite. As a part of eThread, we also developed eContact, which is a Bayesian classifier for the prediction of inter-residue contacts and eRank, which effectively ranks generated multiple protein models and provides reliable confidence estimates as structure quality assessment. Excluding closely related templates from the modeling process, eThread generates models, which are correct at the fold level, for >80% of the targets; 40–50% of the constructed models are of a very high quality, which would be considered accurate at the family level. Furthermore, in large-scale benchmarking, we compare the performance of eThread to several alternative methods commonly used in protein structure prediction. Finally, we estimate the upper bound for this type of approach and discuss the directions towards further improvements.

Suggested Citation

  • Michal Brylinski & Daswanth Lingam, 2012. "eThread: A Highly Optimized Machine Learning-Based Approach to Meta-Threading and the Modeling of Protein Tertiary Structures," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-12, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0050200
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0050200
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0050200&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0050200?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexandra M Schnoes & Shoshana D Brown & Igor Dodevski & Patricia C Babbitt, 2009. "Annotation Error in Public Databases: Misannotation of Molecular Function in Enzyme Superfamilies," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(12), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michal Brylinski, 2014. "eMatchSite: Sequence Order-Independent Structure Alignments of Ligand Binding Pockets in Protein Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rui Fa & Domenico Cozzetto & Cen Wan & David T Jones, 2018. "Predicting human protein function with multi-task deep neural networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Thomas J Sharpton & Samantha J Riesenfeld & Steven W Kembel & Joshua Ladau & James P O'Dwyer & Jessica L Green & Jonathan A Eisen & Katherine S Pollard, 2011. "PhylOTU: A High-Throughput Procedure Quantifies Microbial Community Diversity and Resolves Novel Taxa from Metagenomic Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, January.
    3. Akira R Kinjo & Haruki Nakamura, 2012. "Composite Structural Motifs of Binding Sites for Delineating Biological Functions of Proteins," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(2), pages 1-11, February.
    4. Elisa Boari de Lima & Wagner Meira Júnior & Raquel Cardoso de Melo-Minardi, 2016. "Isofunctional Protein Subfamily Detection Using Data Integration and Spectral Clustering," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-32, June.
    5. Matthew N Benedict & Michael B Mundy & Christopher S Henry & Nicholas Chia & Nathan D Price, 2014. "Likelihood-Based Gene Annotations for Gap Filling and Quality Assessment in Genome-Scale Metabolic Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Wing-Cheong Wong & Sebastian Maurer-Stroh & Frank Eisenhaber, 2010. "More Than 1,001 Problems with Protein Domain Databases: Transmembrane Regions, Signal Peptides and the Issue of Sequence Homology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Yuval Bussi & Ruti Kapon & Ziv Reich, 2021. "Large-scale k-mer-based analysis of the informational properties of genomes, comparative genomics and taxonomy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-27, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0050200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.