IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0049936.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterization of X-ray Dose in Murine Animals Using microCT, a New Low-Dose Detector and nanoDot Dosimeters

Author

Listed:
  • Dustin R Osborne
  • Shikui Yan
  • Alan Stuckey
  • Lindy Pryer
  • Tina Richey
  • Jonathan S Wall

Abstract

Background: Dose continues to be an area of concern in preclinical imaging studies, especially for those imaging disease progression in longitudinal studies. To our knowledge, this work is the first to characterize and assess dose from the Inveon CT imaging platform using nanoDot dosimeters. This work is also the first to characterize a new low-dose configuration available for this platform. Methodology/Principal Findings: nanoDot dosimeters from Landauer, Inc. were surgically implanted into 15 wild type mice. Two nanoDots were placed in each animal: one just under the skin behind the spine and the other located centrally within the abdomen. A manufacturer-recommended CT protocol was created with 1 projection per degree of rotation acquired over 360 degrees. For best comparison of the low dose and standard configurations, noise characteristics of the reconstructed images were used to match the acquisition protocol parameters. Results for all dose measurements showed the average dose delivered to the abdomen to be 13.8 cGy±0.74 and 0.97 cGy±0.05 for standard and low dose configurations respectively. Skin measurements of dose averaged 15.99 cGy±0.72 and 1.18 cGy±0.06. For both groups, the standard deviation to mean was less than 5.6%. The maximum dose received for the abdomen was 15.12 cGy and 0.97 cGy while the maximum dose for the skin was 17.3 cGy and 1.32 cGy. Control dosimeters were used for each group to validate that no unwanted additional radiation was present to bias the results. Conclusions/Significance: This study shows that the Inveon CT platform is suitable for imaging mice both for single and longitudinal studies. Use of low-dose detector hardware results in significant reductions in dose to subjects with a >12x (90%) reduction in delivered dose. Installation of this hardware on another in vivo microCT platform resulted in dose reductions of over 9x (89%).

Suggested Citation

  • Dustin R Osborne & Shikui Yan & Alan Stuckey & Lindy Pryer & Tina Richey & Jonathan S Wall, 2012. "Characterization of X-ray Dose in Murine Animals Using microCT, a New Low-Dose Detector and nanoDot Dosimeters," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-9, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0049936
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0049936
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0049936&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0049936?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0049936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.