IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0048993.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between FGFR3 and TP53 Mutations in Bladder Cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Yann Neuzillet
  • Xavier Paoletti
  • Slah Ouerhani
  • Pierre Mongiat-Artus
  • Hany Soliman
  • Hugues de The
  • Mathilde Sibony
  • Yves Denoux
  • Vincent Molinie
  • Aurélie Herault
  • May-Linda Lepage
  • Pascale Maille
  • Audrey Renou
  • Dimitri Vordos
  • Claude-Clément Abbou
  • Ashraf Bakkar
  • Bernard Asselain
  • Nadia Kourda
  • Amel El Gaaied
  • Karen Leroy
  • Agnès Laplanche
  • Simone Benhamou
  • Thierry Lebret
  • Yves Allory
  • François Radvanyi

Abstract

TP53 and FGFR3 mutations are the most common mutations in bladder cancers. FGFR3 mutations are most frequent in low-grade low-stage tumours, whereas TP53 mutations are most frequent in high-grade high-stage tumours. Several studies have reported FGFR3 and TP53 mutations to be mutually exclusive events, whereas others have reported them to be independent. We carried out a meta-analysis of published findings for FGFR3 and TP53 mutations in bladder cancer (535 tumours, 6 publications) and additional unpublished data for 382 tumours. TP53 and FGFR3 mutations were not independent events for all tumours considered together (OR = 0.25 [0.18–0.37], p = 0.0001) or for pT1 tumours alone (OR = 0.47 [0.28–0.79], p = 0.0009). However, if the analysis was restricted to pTa tumours or to muscle-invasive tumours alone, FGFR3 and TP53 mutations were independent events (OR = 0.56 [0.23–1.36] (p = 0.12) and OR = 0.99 [0.37–2.7] (p = 0.35), respectively). After stratification of the tumours by stage and grade, no dependence was detected in the five tumour groups considered (pTaG1 and pTaG2 together, pTaG3, pT1G2, pT1G3, pT2-4). These differences in findings can be attributed to the putative existence of two different pathways of tumour progression in bladder cancer: the CIS pathway, in which FGFR3 mutations are rare, and the Ta pathway, in which FGFR3 mutations are frequent. TP53 mutations occur at the earliest stage of the CIS pathway, whereas they occur would much later in the Ta pathway, at the T1G3 or muscle-invasive stage.

Suggested Citation

  • Yann Neuzillet & Xavier Paoletti & Slah Ouerhani & Pierre Mongiat-Artus & Hany Soliman & Hugues de The & Mathilde Sibony & Yves Denoux & Vincent Molinie & Aurélie Herault & May-Linda Lepage & Pascale , 2012. "A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between FGFR3 and TP53 Mutations in Bladder Cancer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-9, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0048993
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048993
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0048993
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0048993&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0048993?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0048993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.