IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0043366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Suite of Models to Support the Quantitative Assessment of Spread in Pest Risk Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Christelle Robinet
  • Hella Kehlenbeck
  • Darren J Kriticos
  • Richard H A Baker
  • Andrea Battisti
  • Sarah Brunel
  • Maxime Dupin
  • Dominic Eyre
  • Massimo Faccoli
  • Zhenya Ilieva
  • Marc Kenis
  • Jon Knight
  • Philippe Reynaud
  • Annie Yart
  • Wopke van der Werf

Abstract

Pest Risk Analyses (PRAs) are conducted worldwide to decide whether and how exotic plant pests should be regulated to prevent invasion. There is an increasing demand for science-based risk mapping in PRA. Spread plays a key role in determining the potential distribution of pests, but there is no suitable spread modelling tool available for pest risk analysts. Existing models are species specific, biologically and technically complex, and data hungry. Here we present a set of four simple and generic spread models that can be parameterised with limited data. Simulations with these models generate maps of the potential expansion of an invasive species at continental scale. The models have one to three biological parameters. They differ in whether they treat spatial processes implicitly or explicitly, and in whether they consider pest density or pest presence/absence only. The four models represent four complementary perspectives on the process of invasion and, because they have different initial conditions, they can be considered as alternative scenarios. All models take into account habitat distribution and climate. We present an application of each of the four models to the western corn rootworm, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera, using historic data on its spread in Europe. Further tests as proof of concept were conducted with a broad range of taxa (insects, nematodes, plants, and plant pathogens). Pest risk analysts, the intended model users, found the model outputs to be generally credible and useful. The estimation of parameters from data requires insights into population dynamics theory, and this requires guidance. If used appropriately, these generic spread models provide a transparent and objective tool for evaluating the potential spread of pests in PRAs. Further work is needed to validate models, build familiarity in the user community and create a database of species parameters to help realize their potential in PRA practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Christelle Robinet & Hella Kehlenbeck & Darren J Kriticos & Richard H A Baker & Andrea Battisti & Sarah Brunel & Maxime Dupin & Dominic Eyre & Massimo Faccoli & Zhenya Ilieva & Marc Kenis & Jon Knight, 2012. "A Suite of Models to Support the Quantitative Assessment of Spread in Pest Risk Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-18, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0043366
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0043366
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0043366&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0043366?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0043366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.