IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0023666.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Defining Natural History: Assessment of the Ability of College Students to Aid in Characterizing Clinical Progression of Niemann-Pick Disease, Type C

Author

Listed:
  • Jenny Shin
  • Katrina Epperson
  • Nicole M Yanjanin
  • Jennifer Albus
  • Laura Borgenheimer
  • Natalie Bott
  • Erin Brennan
  • Daniel Castellanos
  • Melissa Cheng
  • Michael Clark
  • Margaret Devany
  • Courtney Ensslin
  • Nina Farivari
  • Shanik Fernando
  • Lauren Gabriel
  • Rani Gallardo
  • Moriah Castleman
  • Olimpia Gutierrez
  • Allison Herschel
  • Sarah Hodge
  • Anne Horst
  • Mary Howard
  • Evan James
  • Lindsey Jones
  • Mary Kearns
  • Mary Kelly
  • Christine Kim
  • Kinzie Kiser
  • Gregory Klazura
  • Chris Knoedler
  • Emily Kolbus
  • Lauren Lange
  • Joan Lee
  • Eileena Li
  • Wei Lu
  • Andrew Luttrell
  • Emily Ly
  • Katherine McKeough
  • Brianna McSorley
  • Catherine Miller
  • Sean Mitchell
  • Abbey Moon
  • Kevin Moser
  • Shane O'Brien
  • Paula Olivieri
  • Aaron Patzwahl
  • Marie Pereira
  • Craig Pymento
  • Erin Ramelb
  • Bryce Ramos
  • Teresa Raya
  • Stephen Riney
  • Geoff Roberts
  • Mark Robertshaw
  • Frannie Rudolf
  • Samuel Rund
  • Stephanie Sansone
  • Lindsay Schwartz
  • Ryan Shay
  • Edwin Siu
  • Timothy Spear
  • Catherine Tan
  • Marisa Truong
  • Mairaj Uddin
  • Jennifer VanTrieste
  • Omar Veloz
  • Elizabeth White
  • Forbes D Porter
  • Kasturi Haldar

Abstract

Niemann-Pick Disease, type C (NPC) is a fatal, neurodegenerative, lysosomal storage disorder. It is a rare disease with broad phenotypic spectrum and variable age of onset. These issues make it difficult to develop a universally accepted clinical outcome measure to assess urgently needed therapies. To this end, clinical investigators have defined emerging, disease severity scales. The average time from initial symptom to diagnosis is approximately 4 years. Further, some patients may not travel to specialized clinical centers even after diagnosis. We were therefore interested in investigating whether appropriately trained, community-based assessment of patient records could assist in defining disease progression using clinical severity scores. In this study we evolved a secure, step wise process to show that pre-existing medical records may be correctly assessed by non-clinical practitioners trained to quantify disease progression. Sixty-four undergraduate students at the University of Notre Dame were expertly trained in clinical disease assessment and recognition of major and minor symptoms of NPC. Seven clinical records, randomly selected from a total of thirty seven used to establish a leading clinical severity scale, were correctly assessed to show expected characteristics of linear disease progression. Student assessment of two new records donated by NPC families to our study also revealed linear progression of disease, but both showed accelerated disease progression, relative to the current severity scale, especially at the later stages. Together, these data suggest that college students may be trained in assessment of patient records, and thus provide insight into the natural history of a disease.

Suggested Citation

  • Jenny Shin & Katrina Epperson & Nicole M Yanjanin & Jennifer Albus & Laura Borgenheimer & Natalie Bott & Erin Brennan & Daniel Castellanos & Melissa Cheng & Michael Clark & Margaret Devany & Courtney , 2011. "Defining Natural History: Assessment of the Ability of College Students to Aid in Characterizing Clinical Progression of Niemann-Pick Disease, Type C," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-8, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0023666
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023666
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0023666
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0023666&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0023666?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0023666. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.