IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0020703.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estrogen Receptor Beta rs1271572 Polymorphism and Invasive Ovarian Carcinoma Risk: Pooled Analysis within the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium

Author

Listed:
  • Galina Lurie
  • Lynne R Wilkens
  • Pamela J Thompson
  • Yurii B Shvetsov
  • Rayna K Matsuno
  • Michael E Carney
  • Rachel T Palmieri
  • Anna H Wu
  • Malcolm C Pike
  • Celeste L Pearce
  • Usha Menon
  • Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
  • Simon A Gayther
  • Susan J Ramus
  • Alice S Whittemore
  • Valerie McGuire
  • Weiva Sieh
  • Paul D P Pharoah
  • Honglin Song
  • Jacek Gronwald
  • Anna Jakubowska
  • Cezary Cybulski
  • Jan Lubinski
  • Joellen M Schildkraut
  • Andrew Berchuck
  • Susanne Krüger Kjær
  • Estrid Høgdall
  • Peter A Fasching
  • Matthias W Beckmann
  • Arif B Ekici
  • Alexander Hein
  • Georgia Chenevix-Trench
  • Penelope M Webb
  • Jonathan Beesley
  • The Australian Ovarian Cancer Study and Australian Cancer Study Groups
  • Marc T Goodman
  • The Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium

Abstract

The association of ovarian carcinoma risk with the polymorphism rs1271572 in the estrogen receptor beta (ESR2) gene was examined in 4946 women with primary invasive ovarian carcinoma and 6582 controls in a pooled analysis of ten case-control studies within the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC). All participants were non-Hispanic white women. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using unconditional logistic regression adjusted for site and age. Women with the TT genotype were at increased risk of ovarian carcinoma compared to carriers of the G allele (OR = 1.10; 95%; CI: 1.01–1.21; p = 0.04); the OR was 1.09 (CI: 0.99–1.20; p = 0.07) after excluding data from the center (Hawaii) that nominated this SNP for OCAC genotyping A stronger association of rs1271572 TT versus GT/GG with risk was observed among women aged ≤50 years versus older women (OR = 1.35; CI: 1.12–1.62; p = 0.002; p for interaction = 0.02) that remained statistically significant after excluding Hawaii data (OR = 1.34; CI: 1.11–1.61; p = 0.009). No heterogeneity of the association was observed by study, menopausal status, gravidity, parity, use of contraceptive or menopausal hormones, tumor histological type, or stage at diagnosis. This pooled analysis suggests that rs1271572 might influence the risk of ovarian cancer, in particular among younger women.

Suggested Citation

  • Galina Lurie & Lynne R Wilkens & Pamela J Thompson & Yurii B Shvetsov & Rayna K Matsuno & Michael E Carney & Rachel T Palmieri & Anna H Wu & Malcolm C Pike & Celeste L Pearce & Usha Menon & Aleksandra, 2011. "Estrogen Receptor Beta rs1271572 Polymorphism and Invasive Ovarian Carcinoma Risk: Pooled Analysis within the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(6), pages 1-7, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0020703
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020703
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0020703
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0020703&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0020703?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0020703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.