IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0009697.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Statistic to Evaluate Imputation Reliability

Author

Listed:
  • Peng Lin
  • Sarah M Hartz
  • Zhehao Zhang
  • Scott F Saccone
  • Jia Wang
  • Jay A Tischfield
  • Howard J Edenberg
  • John R Kramer
  • Alison M.Goate
  • Laura J Bierut
  • John P Rice
  • for the COGA Collaborators COGEND Collaborators, GENEVA

Abstract

Background: As the amount of data from genome wide association studies grows dramatically, many interesting scientific questions require imputation to combine or expand datasets. However, there are two situations for which imputation has been problematic: (1) polymorphisms with low minor allele frequency (MAF), and (2) datasets where subjects are genotyped on different platforms. Traditional measures of imputation cannot effectively address these problems. Methodology/Principal Findings: We introduce a new statistic, the imputation quality score (IQS). In order to differentiate between well-imputed and poorly-imputed single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), IQS adjusts the concordance between imputed and genotyped SNPs for chance. We first evaluated IQS in relation to minor allele frequency. Using a sample of subjects genotyped on the Illumina 1 M array, we extracted those SNPs that were also on the Illumina 550 K array and imputed them to the full set of the 1 M SNPs. As expected, the average IQS value drops dramatically with a decrease in minor allele frequency, indicating that IQS appropriately adjusts for minor allele frequency. We then evaluated whether IQS can filter poorly-imputed SNPs in situations where cases and controls are genotyped on different platforms. Randomly dividing the data into “cases” and “controls”, we extracted the Illumina 550 K SNPs from the cases and imputed the remaining Illumina 1 M SNPs. The initial Q-Q plot for the test of association between cases and controls was grossly distorted (λ = 1.15) and had 4016 false positives, reflecting imputation error. After filtering out SNPs with IQS 0.99 demonstrating that a database of IQS values from common imputations could be used as an effective filter to combine data genotyped on different platforms. Conclusions/Significance: IQS effectively differentiates well-imputed and poorly-imputed SNPs. It is particularly useful for SNPs with low minor allele frequency and when datasets are genotyped on different platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng Lin & Sarah M Hartz & Zhehao Zhang & Scott F Saccone & Jia Wang & Jay A Tischfield & Howard J Edenberg & John R Kramer & Alison M.Goate & Laura J Bierut & John P Rice & for the COGA Collaborators, 2010. "A New Statistic to Evaluate Imputation Reliability," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-10, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0009697
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009697
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0009697
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0009697&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0009697?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0009697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.