IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0005254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Phase 1/2a Study of the Malaria Vaccine Candidate Apical Membrane Antigen-1 (AMA-1) Administered in Adjuvant System AS01B or AS02A

Author

Listed:
  • Michele D Spring
  • James F Cummings
  • Christian F Ockenhouse
  • Sheetij Dutta
  • Randall Reidler
  • Evelina Angov
  • Elke Bergmann-Leitner
  • V Ann Stewart
  • Stacey Bittner
  • Laure Juompan
  • Mark G Kortepeter
  • Robin Nielsen
  • Urszula Krzych
  • Ev Tierney
  • Lisa A Ware
  • Megan Dowler
  • Cornelus C Hermsen
  • Robert W Sauerwein
  • Sake J de Vlas
  • Opokua Ofori-Anyinam
  • David E Lanar
  • Jack L Williams
  • Kent E Kester
  • Kathryn Tucker
  • Meng Shi
  • Elissa Malkin
  • Carole Long
  • Carter L Diggs
  • Lorraine Soisson
  • Marie-Claude Dubois
  • W Ripley Ballou
  • Joe Cohen
  • D Gray Heppner Jr

Abstract

Background: This Phase 1/2a study evaluated the safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of an experimental malaria vaccine comprised of the recombinant Plasmodium falciparum protein apical membrane antigen-1 (AMA-1) representing the 3D7 allele formulated with either the AS01B or AS02A Adjuvant Systems. Methodology/Principal Findings: After a preliminary safety evaluation of low dose AMA-1/AS01B (10 µg/0.5 mL) in 5 adults, 30 malaria-naïve adults were randomly allocated to receive full dose (50 µg/0.5 mL) of AMA-1/AS01B (n = 15) or AMA-1/AS02A (n = 15), followed by a malaria challenge. All vaccinations were administered intramuscularly on a 0-, 1-, 2-month schedule. All volunteers experienced transient injection site erythema, swelling and pain. Two weeks post-third vaccination, anti-AMA-1 Geometric Mean Antibody Concentrations (GMCs) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) were high: low dose AMA-1/AS01B 196 µg/mL (103–371 µg/mL), full dose AMA-1/AS01B 279 µg/mL (210–369 µg/mL) and full dose AMA-1/AS02A 216 µg/mL (169–276 µg/mL) with no significant difference among the 3 groups. The three vaccine formulations elicited equivalent functional antibody responses, as measured by growth inhibition assay (GIA), against homologous but not against heterologous (FVO) parasites as well as demonstrable interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) responses. To assess efficacy, volunteers were challenged with P. falciparum-infected mosquitoes, and all became parasitemic, with no significant difference in the prepatent period by either light microscopy or quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). However, a small but significant reduction of parasitemia in the AMA-1/AS02A group was seen with a statistical model employing qPCR measurements. Significance: All three vaccine formulations were found to be safe and highly immunogenic. These immune responses did not translate into significant vaccine efficacy in malaria-naïve adults employing a primary sporozoite challenge model, but encouragingly, estimation of parasite growth rates from qPCR data may suggest a partial biological effect of the vaccine. Further evaluation of the immunogenicity and efficacy of the AMA-1/AS02A formulation is ongoing in a malaria-experienced pediatric population in Mali. Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00385047

Suggested Citation

  • Michele D Spring & James F Cummings & Christian F Ockenhouse & Sheetij Dutta & Randall Reidler & Evelina Angov & Elke Bergmann-Leitner & V Ann Stewart & Stacey Bittner & Laure Juompan & Mark G Kortepe, 2009. "Phase 1/2a Study of the Malaria Vaccine Candidate Apical Membrane Antigen-1 (AMA-1) Administered in Adjuvant System AS01B or AS02A," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(4), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0005254
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0005254
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0005254&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0005254?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0005254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.