IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0002266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Case-Control Cohort Study of Patients' Perceptions of Disability in Mastocytosis

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Hermine
  • Olivier Lortholary
  • Phillip S Leventhal
  • Adeline Catteau
  • Frédérique Soppelsa
  • Cedric Baude
  • Annick Cohen-Akenine
  • Fabienne Palmérini
  • Katia Hanssens
  • Ying Yang
  • Hagay Sobol
  • Sylvie Fraytag
  • David Ghez
  • Felipe Suarez
  • Stéphane Barete
  • Philippe Casassus
  • Beatrice Sans
  • Michel Arock
  • Jean Pierre Kinet
  • Patrice Dubreuil
  • Alain Moussy

Abstract

Background: Indolent forms of mastocytosis account for more than 90% of all cases, but the types and type and severity of symptoms and their impact on the quality of life have not been well studied. We therefore performed a case-control cohort study to examine self-reported disability and impact of symptoms on the quality of life in patients with mastocytosis. Methodology/Principal Findings: In 2004, 363 mastocytosis patients and 90 controls in France were asked to rate to their overall disability (OPA score) and the severity of 38 individual symptoms. The latter was used to calculate a composite score (AFIRMM score). Of the 363 respondents, 262 were part of an ongoing pathophysiological study so that the following data were available: World Health Organization classification, standard measures of physical and psychological disability, existence of the D816V KIT mutation, and serum tryptase level. The mean OPA and AFIRMM scores and the standard measures of disability indicated that most mastocytosis patients suffer from disabilities due to the disease. Surprisingly, the patient's measurable and perceived disabilities did not differ according to disease classification or presence or absence of the D816V KIT mutation or an elevated (≥20 ng/mL) serum tryptase level. Also, 32 of the 38 AFIRMM symptoms were more common in patients than controls, but there were not substantial differences according to disease classification, presence of the D816V mutation, or the serum tryptase level. Conclusions: On the basis of these results and for the purposes of treatment, we propose that mastocytosis be first classified as aggressive or indolent and that indolent mastocytosis then be categorized according to the severity of patients' perceived symptoms and their impact on the quality of life. In addition, it appears that mastocytosis patients suffer from more symptoms and greater disability than previously thought, that mastocytosis may therefore be under-diagnosed, and that the symptoms of the indolent forms of mastocytosis might be due more to systemic release of mediators than mast cell burden.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Hermine & Olivier Lortholary & Phillip S Leventhal & Adeline Catteau & Frédérique Soppelsa & Cedric Baude & Annick Cohen-Akenine & Fabienne Palmérini & Katia Hanssens & Ying Yang & Hagay Sobol, 2008. "Case-Control Cohort Study of Patients' Perceptions of Disability in Mastocytosis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(5), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0002266
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0002266
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0002266&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0002266?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0002266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.