IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0001412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self Assessment in Insects: Honeybee Queens Know Their Own Strength

Author

Listed:
  • Vincent Dietemann
  • Huo-Qing Zheng
  • Colleen Hepburn
  • H Randall Hepburn
  • Shui-Hua Jin
  • Robin M Crewe
  • Sarah E Radloff
  • Fu-Liang Hu
  • Christian W W Pirk

Abstract

Contests mediate access to reproductive opportunities in almost all species of animals. An important aspect of the evolution of contests is the reduction of the costs incurred during intra-specific encounters to a minimum. However, escalated fights are commonly lethal in some species like the honeybee, Apis mellifera. By experimentally reducing honeybee queens' fighting abilities, we demonstrate that they refrain from engaging in lethal contests that typically characterize their reproductive dominance behavior and coexist peacefully within a colony. This suggests that weak queens exploit an alternative reproductive strategy and provides an explanation for rare occurrences of queen cohabitation in nature. Our results further indicate that self-assessment, but not mutual assessment of fighting ability occurs prior to and during the agonistic encounters.

Suggested Citation

  • Vincent Dietemann & Huo-Qing Zheng & Colleen Hepburn & H Randall Hepburn & Shui-Hua Jin & Robin M Crewe & Sarah E Radloff & Fu-Liang Hu & Christian W W Pirk, 2008. "Self Assessment in Insects: Honeybee Queens Know Their Own Strength," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(1), pages 1-5, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0001412
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0001412
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0001412&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0001412?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elizabeth A. Tibbetts & James Dale, 2004. "A socially enforced signal of quality in a paper wasp," Nature, Nature, vol. 432(7014), pages 218-222, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizabeth A Hobson & Simon DeDeo, 2015. "Social Feedback and the Emergence of Rank in Animal Society," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Adrian G Dyer & Quoc C Vuong, 2008. "Insect Brains Use Image Interpolation Mechanisms to Recognise Rotated Objects," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(12), pages 1-4, December.
    3. Anthony C. Little & Vít Třebický & Jan Havlíček & S. Craig Roberts & Karel Kleisner, 2015. "Editor's choice Human perception of fighting ability: facial cues predict winners and losers in mixed martial arts fights," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(6), pages 1470-1475.
    4. Sergio Nolazco & Kaspar Delhey & Shinichi Nakagawa & Anne Peters, 2022. "Ornaments are equally informative in male and female birds," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0001412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.