IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0000196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Meta-Analysis in Genome-Wide Association Datasets: Strategies and Application in Parkinson Disease

Author

Listed:
  • Evangelos Evangelou
  • Demetrius M Maraganore
  • John PA Ioannidis

Abstract

Background: Genome-wide association studies hold substantial promise for identifying common genetic variants that regulate susceptibility to complex diseases. However, for the detection of small genetic effects, single studies may be underpowered. Power may be improved by combining genome-wide datasets with meta-analytic techniques. Methodology/Principal Findings: Both single and two-stage genome-wide data may be combined and there are several possible strategies. In the two-stage framework, we considered the options of (1) enhancement of replication data and (2) enhancement of first-stage data, and then, we also considered (3) joint meta-analyses including all first-stage and second-stage data. These strategies were examined empirically using data from two genome-wide association studies (three datasets) on Parkinson disease. In the three strategies, we derived 12, 5, and 49 single nucleotide polymorphisms that show significant associations at conventional levels of statistical significance. None of these remained significant after conservative adjustment for the number of performed analyses in each strategy. However, some may warrant further consideration: 6 SNPs were identified with at least 2 of the 3 strategies and 3 SNPs [rs1000291 on chromosome 3, rs2241743 on chromosome 4 and rs3018626 on chromosome 11] were identified with all 3 strategies and had no or minimal between-dataset heterogeneity (I2 = 0, 0 and 15%, respectively). Analyses were primarily limited by the suboptimal overlap of tested polymorphisms across different datasets (e.g., only 31,192 shared polymorphisms between the two tier 1 datasets). Conclusions/Significance: Meta-analysis may be used to improve the power and examine the between-dataset heterogeneity of genome-wide association studies. Prospective designs may be most efficient, if they try to maximize the overlap of genotyping platforms and anticipate the combination of data across many genome-wide association studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Evangelos Evangelou & Demetrius M Maraganore & John PA Ioannidis, 2007. "Meta-Analysis in Genome-Wide Association Datasets: Strategies and Application in Parkinson Disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(2), pages 1-8, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0000196
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0000196
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0000196&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0000196?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jian Li & Yan-fang Guo & Yufang Pei & Hong-Wen Deng, 2012. "The Impact of Imputation on Meta-Analysis of Genome-Wide Association Studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-7, April.
    2. John PA Ioannidis & Nikolaos A Patsopoulos & Evangelos Evangelou, 2007. "Heterogeneity in Meta-Analyses of Genome-Wide Association Investigations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(9), pages 1-7, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0000196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.