IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0014759.html

Prevalence of Strongyloides stercoralis infection among African children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Tadesse Hailu
  • Arancha Amor
  • Getaneh Alemu
  • Hiwot Tadesse
  • Veeranoot Nissapatorn
  • Hesham Al-Mekhlafi

Abstract

Strongyloides stercoralis is a neglected parasite that causes strongyloidiasis. However, the true prevalence of strongyloidiasis is underreported due to low-sensitivity diagnostic methods. This systematic review assessed the prevalence of S. stercoralis among African children and its variation by diagnostic methods, countries, and study settings. All studies published in African countries on S. stercoralis prevalence up to the year 2025 in the PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and ScienceDirect databases were included. Identification, screening, checking the eligibility, and including the relevant studies were done following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Out of 651 articles screened, 27 studies involving 16,358 children were included in the systematic review. The pooled prevalence of S. stercoralis among African children was 14% using a random-effect model. The highest pooled prevalence of S. stercoralis was recorded at 27% in Côte d’Ivoire, followed by 26% in Ethiopia. A high prevalence (36%) of S. stercoralis was obtained by a combination of PCR, culture, and microscopic diagnostic methods. This review indicated that S. stercoralis prevalence in African children is considerable and likely underestimated due to low-sensitivity diagnostics. Therefore, further studies using sensitive diagnostic approaches are urgently needed to determine the true burden of strongyloidiasis.Author summary: Strongyloides stercoralis remains a neglected soil-transmitted helminth with limited data on its burden among children in Africa. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence and assess diagnostic approaches across the continent. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect identified 651 records, of which 27 studies met the inclusion criteria. Using a random-effects model, the pooled prevalence of S. stercoralis infection was high with substantial heterogeneity across studies. Lower estimates were reported in studies using less sensitive diagnostic methods such as direct microscopy and formol-ether concentration. In contrast, studies employing combined techniques, including PCR and culture methods, reported markedly higher detection rates. These findings highlight the underestimation of infection due to diagnostic limitations and emphasize the need for improved surveillance, sensitive diagnostic tools, and targeted control strategies for children in endemic settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Tadesse Hailu & Arancha Amor & Getaneh Alemu & Hiwot Tadesse & Veeranoot Nissapatorn & Hesham Al-Mekhlafi, 2026. "Prevalence of Strongyloides stercoralis infection among African children: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(10), pages 1-12, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0014759
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0014759
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0014759
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0014759&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0014759?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0014759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.