Author
Listed:
- Ezra Kiprono Yator
- Peter Mbugua Njogu
Abstract
Background: Albendazole is a broad-spectrum anthelminthic extensively used in clinical settings and national deworming programs. It is the cornerstone of the preventive chemotherapy for soil-transmitted helminthiases prevalent in low-resource settings. The high proliferation of albendazole generic products, with poor post-market surveillance capacity in the low- and middle-income countries, poses dire risk of substandard and falsified medicines, which may predispose patients to treatment failures, adverse drug reactions, morbidity, and mortality, with consequent loss of public confidence in healthcare systems. Objective: This study aimed to determine the quality and pharmaceutical equivalence of albendazole 400 mg tablet brands marketed in Nairobi, Kenya. Experimental: A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted on seven albendazole 400 mg tablet brands purchased from pharmacy outlets in Nairobi. Tests for identity, friability, hardness, disintegration, assay, uniformity of weight, and dissolution were conducted as specified in the United States, British and International Pharmacopoeias. Dissolution profiles of generic albendazole tablet brands and the innovator brand (Zentel) were compared using model independent fit factors f1 and f2, and the dissolution efficiency (DE). Data was captured and analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2021, and reported as means, relative standard deviations, and percentages. Results: All the seven albendazole 400 mg tablet brands complied with compendial specifications for identity, friability, hardness, assay, and uniformity of weight. However, two brands (EK5 and EK6) did not comply with the disintegration test and consequently demonstrated extremely poor dissolution, having released 50, f1
Suggested Citation
Ezra Kiprono Yator & Peter Mbugua Njogu, 2026.
"Post-market surveillance of albendazole tablet brands in Kenya: Implications for deworming programs and clinical outcomes,"
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-1, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pntd00:0014449
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0014449
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0014449. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.